Should the Bannerman Shield final be a three game series?

Discussion in 'Bannerman Shield' started by Cribbage, Jun 1, 2011.

?

Atlas Copco

  1. Yes

    27 vote(s)
    40.9%

  2. No

    32 vote(s)
    48.5%

  3. ABC Bearings

    7 vote(s)
    10.6%
Page 1 of 6

  1. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Well should it?
     
    Cribbage, Jun 1, 2011
    #1

  2. Gazza GJ Weaver

    Yes. Yes it should.
     
    Gazza, Jun 1, 2011
    #2

  3. Julian BJ Taylor

    Nah. Hate fucking American set ups.
     
    Julian, Jun 1, 2011
    #3

  4. Eds E Ames

    Nah. A final is a final. S7 BS final to c' why it should only be one.
     
    Eds, Jun 1, 2011
    #4

  5. Jabba HJ Bots

    this doesn't suit cricket.
     
    Jabba, Jun 1, 2011
    #5

  6. Alec AD Funkotron

    No, I'd rather eat an ass pickle.
     
    Alec, Jun 1, 2011
    #6

  7. El Nino J Torres

    Nah. Leave it as is.
     
    El Nino, Jun 1, 2011
    #7

  8. SM MD Dorn

    I voted yes, but i believe it's a timeless final?
     
    SM, Jun 1, 2011
    #8

  9. MightyPies DA Alessi

    I think it could add another aspect to the Final. But then again, its cricket not basketball.
     
    MightyPies, Jun 1, 2011
    #9

  10. AVA T Delonge

    Loading up on ABC bearings tbh.
     
    AVA, Jun 1, 2011
    #10

  11. Cribbage RG Cribb

    I am sure they will appreciate the advertising.
     
    Cribbage, Jun 1, 2011
    #11

  12. Sultan Pepper HG Emm

    I prefer one game myself.
     
    Sultan Pepper, Jun 1, 2011
    #12

  13. HeathDavisSpeed HT Davis

    I voted yes as well, but forgot it's a timeless final. Swap my vote to 'no' then.
     
    HeathDavisSpeed, Jun 1, 2011
    #13

  14. Wilson SB Wilson

    Definitely yes.
     
    Wilson, Jun 1, 2011
    #14

  15. AVA T Delonge

    How does timeless come into it? The point of a 3 game series is to rule out any fluky/unlucky performances and give a better reflection of skill, I can't see how timeless games come into that?

    Anyway, i'm torn. It gives a better reflection, but then if a team is clearly better they wouldn't lose. So yeah.
     
    AVA, Jun 1, 2011
    #15

  16. Frizzed WC Welker

    Nah.
     
    Frizzed, Jun 1, 2011
    #16

  17. Alec AD Funkotron

    Why change something that works?
     
    Alec, Jun 1, 2011
    #17

  18. Wilson SB Wilson

    And there has been some bullshit wins like the Ravens.

    It also helps ease the pressure of injuries if there are any etc etc. Obvious answer is yes.
     
    Wilson, Jun 1, 2011
    #18

  19. Wilson SB Wilson

    To improve it. What a stupid question.
     
    Wilson, Jun 1, 2011
    #19

  20. HeathDavisSpeed HT Davis

    But that's the point of a final. Not necessarily the best team on paper wins. The only reason I voted 'Yes' is that I hate to see a team win by drawing. I thought whoever finished 1st in the table won the Shield if they drew the grand final.
     
    HeathDavisSpeed, Jun 1, 2011
    #20
Page 1 of 6

Share This Page