Should the Bannerman Shield final be a three game series?

Discussion in 'Bannerman Shield' started by Cribbage, Jun 1, 2011.

?

Atlas Copco

  1. Yes

    27 vote(s)
    40.9%
  2. No

    32 vote(s)
    48.5%
  3. ABC Bearings

    7 vote(s)
    10.6%
  1. Eds E Ames

    And that's the beauty of it.
     
  2. Baxter MJ Deane

    Only because it's the only hope the Saders have of winning anything
     
  3. Eds E Ames

    Ummm... no, not really. :/
     
  4. Baxter MJ Deane

    ZOMG BANTER ON CRICSIM IS DEAD z
     
  5. Mousey AJ Son

    Like Eds said, that's the beauty of it. That's my opinion. Randomness isn't a huge factor. If you're good enoguh to make the final you're good enough to win the comp. That's just my take on it.
     
  6. Old Mate M Perry

    Ironically it's how the Ravens won a final. <_<
     
  7. Cribbage RG Cribb

    DON'T NEED THE Z HERE
     
  8. 99* JJ Ritchie

    WHY NOT? z
     
  9. Athlai JJD Heads

    YEAH NEED MORE Z
    z
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2011
  10. Chewie JA Chewie

    ZZZZ

    z
     
  11. McGrath JE McGrath

  12. irottev CJ Smith

    Will be lucky if we get that far before we all die of old age or the impending 2019 AIDS outbreak throughout the Ravens side in their case.

    But I think probably 1 because best of 3 finals aren't really done for anything in cricket.
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2011
  13. MatthewJay TA Miokovic

    Definitely yes.
     
  14. Callum CJ Laing

    I voted yes. I think it gives a better showing for who the best team actually is. Leave one off games to the shorter formats of cricket IMO. If they started playing one off Test matches it would be balls IMO, however, Test series are good.
     
  15. El Nino J Torres

    Can't believe how everyone is comparing this to a test series or an origin series etc. We have a fucking round robin competition where everyone plays everyone twice and your spot in the final is earnt. It isnt a one off match between 2 teams who decided to play against each other ffs.
     
  16. BoyBlunder BOY Blunder

    Yeh exactly. Fucking stupid comparisons.

    I don't see any advantage to this. If you want the best team of the season to win then surely the best method is to just have the Minor Premiers win the BS. If you want a final with all the buzz and excitement it brings then the best method is a one off match.
     
  17. Athlai JJD Heads

    Yeah OMG the underdog won a match! Better play a best of 3!!!

    Whats the point? If you want the best team to win the whole thing for sure why even bother with a final?
     
  18. Callum CJ Laing

    Well I am not really a fan of a league that then has finals.
     
  19. BoyBlunder BOY Blunder

    But this isn't what the vote is for.
     
  20. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Spot the Cyclones player.
     

Share This Page