It's a suggestions thread....with suggestions for Rob.....Robert Cribb.....the site owner....the simmer....are you catching on you muppet. Who gives a flying f*** if you think the suggestions are good or not. Just go to google images already and find some pretendy photos to make yourself e-popular.
I am not into all this e-tough bollocks and have very little time for people who are. People who troll people and post deliberate shit stirring remarks get on my tit's.....much like you have in this thread. So in reply....If I saw you in real life....I would be more likely to say alright mate...you really made a mug of yourself didn't you.
haha, zing marcuss Could maybe do a back-to-back rivalry round somewhere? Like 2 clubs with an established rivalry play each other back-to-back over 2/3 days or a weekend?
Oh p...lease, Mr I'm Going To Be a First Class Cricketer Soon Despite Nobody Having Heard Of Me Yet. ...anyway you just got shot down by BigDougy, so get back in your cage gimp.
I like this. But dont want to have to put even more work on an excellent job the Herald arealready doing.
I'll just hope that's positive. Regarding the loans, why would teams loan players if they'd get nothing in return.
The player would at least be getting experience surely, might give teams an idea of how capable some players are...
No it isn't. In the game against the pumas there had already been about 400 overs, and Cribb said we needed to bat 130 for a draw. That would be a joke. If you're gonna add a game, maybe a Form XI Vs Under-performed Rep XI. So the Form XI will have your players like Flash and Dave, and the Under-performed XI would have people like Bullpitt, Davis and myself.
Indeed. I think the loan system would be good if home grounds are in place for ALC. It means when you are playing at a spinners paradise you might look to trade a quick for that round with a spinner for another team who is playing on a green pitch.
I don't like it if it's gonna be used that often. I was more thinking that if say Burridge was averaging 90 in the ALC and couldn't crack our team, but say the Pumas had no openers going well at all, we could loan or trade him to them for a certain amount of games as long as it benefits both clubs. I don't think trades should be allowed without Robs approval, otherwise you will see awesome players trading to other teams for finals.
I was thinking it was more for ALC players only. So Burridge would only be moving to the Pumas seconds team as this league is about developing as players to be able to have a shot in BS. But you could change it up in so many ways. Have limits per a team of number of loans/trades each season Teams revert back to original lineup for finals
