Round 7 - Ravens v Gamblers at Unkindness (completed)

*attempting/who have attempted

Anyways, so you would advocate that your country's 'A' team performances also play an equal part in it's rankings?

How does higher quality = greater importance? Because Quality > Quantity imo, and the 2nd XI (ALC) only exists because there are extras in the club. (Basically what Skippos said put in a nicer way )

Regardless, I don't think your idea that they should be treated equally is wrong at all though, I see a fair amount of sense in that as well, since it would be a good indication of the success of a club overall. However it just feels fair to me that those playing cricket of a higher quality should be rewarded better in the club rankings, since the premier competition the club takes part in matters the most in determining how good at cricket a club is.

 

When judging a club, overall, yes actually.

Talk about a ridiculous statement. Assessing a club overall has nothing to do with how many people go the their games.

By that standard Souths are stronger than Melbourne.

 

lol, no he doesn't. He used crowd figures as a test of a club. Might as well have used the type of grass on which they played.

 

No. That is a different question.

The argument is not quality vs quantity. All clubs have two sides. The argument is uniformity and consistency.

 

Stingrays then, consistently wank.

 

I think what he meant was if junior cricket was givem as much importance in the rankings, thousands would turn up for it