yeah but look at cricsim - if you go inactive for a season and get played in first grade while inactive it generally kills you. I'm lucky it didn't but played BS in season 8/9/a bit of 10 while virtually inactive, ruined past performance etc.
chewie's considered the best despite having had one season where he was a bit worse than me - and that's it though? Even so, let's make it over the last 3 seasons Skippos's last 3 BS seasons - 4141 runs @ 57.51 Torres's last 3 BS seasons - 4058 runs @ 54.10 If you narrow it to two, it's like 63 v 59 or something in my favour, and over one it's 80 v 60. I'm hardly a one hit wonder. If you even make it over 4 seasons, it's 56 v 51 in my favour. Yet again I only played one BS game in S8 though. I'm just saying - I'm not a one hit wonder, I've got a pretty fucking good BS record over time - and it's better than torres and our samples are pretty equal. Also worth considering that one of those seasons I spent 40% of it in ALC and the rest of it I spent at number 5 - grossly out of position.
Being the best means being the best at BOTH BS and Provincial cricket. Provincial cricket is, for the most part, a higher standard of cricket. It's the main reason a lot of people had major qualms with Luffman being called the #1 batsmen back when he was dominating BS. I, personally, also consider longevity to be a factor when considering who is the best batsmen.