Our batting is definately strong enough to cope against any of the BS bowling attacks and more than capable of outscoring the other batting attacks. As for myself, this should hopefully be my breakthrough season, should open for the Rays permanently and also opening for GB in the next round of the PC. So hopefully I can cement a GB spot as well as stay up top for the Rays. On paper however, 77th position looks shite, but should be able to make a big dent in that, once the season starts proper.
Just because they are both rep players doesn't mean that they are equal in terms of playing ability. You can use your fancy ways to put shit but the fact is Dave > Dafter in every possible way. Don't even try to bring Dafter up to his level... Just don't... Infact don't even reply to this post because you will just come up with more bullshit. But hey! I can do that too. Ok everybody Saders will have the best batting next season. Bakkum is coming into his second season so that means his batting average will be multiplied by two because he plays with the Saders and we are underrated. He and Guest will be our main big players in our batting High and the rest are consistent because I say they are and want them to be. They have good averages and their rankings don't do them justice... but every other team who has a batsmen with a low ranking, they are shit players inconsistent and everything. Oh and our batting goes all the way down to 11. Because our number 11 scored a half century once so by my rules he will do that every game.... cause he is a Crusader and we are underrated. So with all that we are going to be scoring about 400 runs on average an innings, pretty underrated and with our awesome bowling we will bowl every team out for 10. So I think we will take out the comp because Saders are underrated... Did I mention we are underrated ? Because If I didn't I'll just start 8 threads every day to say how underrated we are... So you know we are underrated now. Underrated underrated underrated.
I know you said not to reply but..... I've said many times that Dafter cannot be compared to Dave. Find me one post where I said that Dafter was equal to Dave. Find me one post in any thread. I was simply making the point that saying that Armstrong was a rep player was really not that accurate and doesn't say much.
How? I don't consider games for GB and NZ as rep quality. Victoria only just qualify. If I say someone is rep quality, it's because they would make QLD/NSW.
