Ged, enough of these threads / posts where you try and point out where the Stingrays are under-rated. No one gives a shit dude.
...not that much better. If Downpipes resigns then I'd agree your better, but if he doesn't I reckon we would be.
I know that people won't agree, the thread's here for people to have their say more than anything. I know that people won't agree.
But you claimed you were a match for them then had the extra bats? At least that's what I thought, I knew your initial comment was about us matching them for openers. I still think Gamblers > Pumas > Rest... Your extra bats aren't the greatest, they don't make up that much.
This but in a more bored, don't care about Ged trying to get people to care about his shit team, way. Seriously Ged, go do something better than try talk up the Rays. It's about as old as Boob is fat.
If downpipes doesn't: Rays: 3, 14, 24, 29, 36, 53, 77. Vipers: 4, 16, 23, 30, 45, 49, 60 It's basically even as I see it. Add in there that Berkuta's much better than his 29 rating which has moved to the low 20's after his ton for nsw and I'd take ours.
Dude. this thread was made to give an opinion. That's my opinion so I'm going to say it. People can argue what they like.
As far as I see it, their 1 - 7 aren't worth an extra 40 runs a game than ours. Rankings aren't a great way to measure the Rays batting anyway, I more put it there for a guide. Berkuta and Hornby are only starting to rise the rankings now and they aren't really an accurate guide of where they are at imo. In rankings alone, I'd say Pumas > Gamblers > Rays.
So the 2 best batsman(By a mile) plus Davis who on his day is the best opener. FFS our weakest link in our top 4 is a rep opening batsman. This thread is really quite silly.
