Based on expecting signings (eg. Choco and Bullpitt to Gamblers, etc) the ratings spreadsheet says... 1. Gamblers - 98.95 2. Stingrays - 90.56 3. Ravens - 82.96 4. Cyclones - 82.46 5. Crusaders - 77.72 6. Stickies - 77.64 7. Vipers - 75.33 8. Pumas - 72.89
Actually the Crusaders one is wrong; it should read 80.86. 1. Gamblers - 98.95 2. Stingrays - 90.56 3. Ravens - 82.96 4. Cyclones - 82.46 5. Crusaders - 80.86 6. Stickies - 77.64 7. Vipers - 75.33 8. Pumas - 72.89
Imagine how bad they'd be without you. Code: #DA Eggman 112.27 #BOY Blunder 79.51 #BA Storer 71.83 #CJ Devonshire 67.13 #JM Hughes 53.02
From what I can gather hes got the ratings as they are right now But if there was another game to be played that counted towards something then he wouldnt have a way of calculating the effect that it had on the current rating value and it would all go to shit Thats just guessing though
I already had a lot of this shit saved to spreadsheet which I saved to my laptop hard drive. I'm just fiddling around with it.
Code: <a href=http://cricsim.com/site/players.php?id=410>GJ Weaver</a> 98.00 <a href=http://cricsim.com/site/players.php?id=319>AP Farnsworth</a> 97.72 <a href=http://cricsim.com/site/players.php?id=82>WD Robinson</a> 68.15 <a href=http://cricsim.com/site/players.php?id=86>GEC King</a> 98.68 <a href=http://cricsim.com/site/players.php?id=178>HJ Bots</a> 84.88