Seeing as we have to lynch someone as no lynch isn't an option, then I tend to agree - unless some more compelling evidence comes up (which looks unlikely at this stage).
How does that seem unconvincing? I can't be convinced about what happened with his report because I'm not Howe, or Himann. Ridiculous logic. I would suggest a no lynch but it's banned for some reason. All I can really do is ask that we wait for more info to come forward.
"Well uh, your report must be wrong." Do I really need to explain why I'm unconvinced lol. If Himannv turns out to be lying or have a fake report than we work it out tomorrow. More info...? It's been 24 hours and this is all we've got. And since days last until a lynch is passed and we have to lynch, there isn't any other legit options.
I tend to agree with your logic here. Are our options to date: 1 - We are all playing Howe 2 - Town = Humans / Maf = non-humans? What other probabilities are there? Lynch Blunder
Lynch Blunder If there is mafia in this, I'd assume they'd be non-human, and Blunder's denial makes him suss in my eyes.
I'll give it a few more hours, if there's nothing more forthcoming I'll lynch Seriously doubt we'll get something more incriminating though.
I'm actually not too keen on lynching Blunder here. The equipment I used to investigate him sounds a bit too wonky.
To expand: I used something called Aperture Science Aerial Faith Plate which propels me in the air. I can use it to see another player. Sounds like my decision making isn't too great while I'm in the air (see [1]). Perhaps instead of implicating Blunder, this actually clears him. [1] - http://half-life.wikia.com/wiki/Aperture_Science_Aerial_Faith_Plate