Discussion in 'Offseason Club Cricket' started by Cribbage, Nov 15, 2009.
Pretending F Burn is anywhere near my standard Â¬_Â¬
Torres is in BS, Freezerburn did it for 3 games, that's nowhere near Veri tbh.
Thought Ridd did well, 58@26, who's your equivalent??
Oh and Smith as in Fiery?
"As well as" not AS.
TBH this is a silly argument as more often than not depth ain't a big advantage.
AVA said your depth could rival ours, I'm yet to see it.
Agree with Luffers take the best 1 or 2 bowlers, 2 best batsmen/keeper and best allrounder and imo that is you depth.
Ridd and Darts works.
Verigotta hasn't proved much at all, either has Burn. Both could do anything this season.
Johnson has played both FC and SC cricket, he can be there instead of Torres.
All this comes down to nothing as our FC side is better than that of the Cyclones, so only one or two will probably be needed throughout the season, so i'd say our depth is perfectly fine, and potentially better than yours.
Ridd > Darts by a considerable margin. Verigoat hasn't proved much but he did better than Freezerburn.
Johnson is fair enough if you're just counting me as a batsman.
Our depth > Yours, we've got more bases covered by better players imho.
But our original players are better, so say we take 3 players out injured from each team, we'll be able to cover them better. That's what I consider as depth.
I had 2 bad games. How did your season go?
Should of called Ryans team Oxford Street Gaylors.
Should've aborted Colesy.
Should have called your team....oh wait, you don't have one.
Everyone knows i run the stingrays anyway.
With out me they would be a an ALC standard side at best.
Colesy you white ****.
Still doing something on the field is something with how dire the Cyclones situation was.
Thats alot of players you're taking out of a squad of 11, lol. So thats good depth.
Nah, bullox. You dribbled on about how your depth is better, which is definitely isn't. They might have impressive stats off the few games they've played, but thats not all you need. The thing about this season going for so long, you're able to get a better read on who will probably be able to make the step up. 100% of the depth Marcuss posted are active, and climbing the posting ranks quickly.
And for that quote, lol. If you took your 3 best players out of your team, and replaced them, you would not be able to cover them better. Thats just flat out bullshit. Cyclones depth however, although they might not have the quality of player in the first XI like you do, so don't go on about that because no one is denying it. It's that the depth players are quite close to the quality of player playing in the first XI. So if they were to get an injury - they'll be over to cover them better.
Lacked Freddy's lead. Bedseh was trying to fill the void I left.
**** up Damo you wanna be black ****.
The rays are what they are because of me, and Gerrard knows this.
Separate names with a comma.