Dispute provincial being a better standard of cricket purely because provinces can't build around structure so even if there's 1-2 less teams in the provincial, you get teams well below the grade (asia, victoria etc.) and then teams with way too many guns (NSW city) keeping the good players out of provincial too.
Morgan vs Torres Code: Bannerman Shield Mts Inns N.O Runs B.F Avg S.R H.S 50s 100s Ducks Season 8 1 2 0 28 97 14.00 28.87 27 0 0 0 8 14 0 556 1074 39.71 51.77 141 3 1 0 Season 9 9 18 1 645 1555 37.94 41.48 126 5 1 2 15 27 2 1082 2459 43.28 44.00 101 10 1 1 Season 10 14 28 1 1252 2380 46.37 52.61 101 10 1 1 16 26 2 1396 2670 58.17 52.28 149 10 4 2 Season 11 16 31 3 2244 4066 80.14 55.19 204* 11 8 0 16 28 2 1580 2966 60.77 53.27 195 4 8 2 Season 12 1 2 0 89 204 44.50 43.63 47 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 4 1.00 25.00 1 0 0 0 You only beat Torres last season as individual seasons. Torres has been consistently consistent
And this season. One thing that I do agree with Skippos about is that it's not really fair in anyone's language to rate Chewie as a better batsman than him currently. Chewie's only played one proper season of FC cricket and Skippos was better than him. Rankings system isn't capable of looking at it like that, but we are. Making an argument for Torres or Flack is fine, but Chewie is definitely not the best bat when he only debut last season and he hasn't even been the best batsman since then.
Yes, but that's weighting each season equally. I think it's probably a more accurate reflection to look at it as averages over a 1,2,3 or even career period (all of which I've won. my career BS average is 5 runs ahead of his, for one - so there's not an argument for him being better IMO), instead of 'who's won the most seasons!' which you're presenting.
You're always going to say that because you had one ridiculously good season. And in that same season Torres alos performed extremely well, something he managed to do the season before as well. 2 seasons @ ~60 > 1 season @ 80 imo