You would only do that if the comparative advantage is better. If picking you at hooker makes the overall team stronger then it should be considered but otherwise backrowers will just beed to watch from the sidelines.
I am not 100% opposed to me playing hooker because I have 20% hooker in me (). I am just not conviced because I have only done it once and that was against the same front row we will meet for South and I wasn't great.
What are the other propping options like? If there's a viable choice at prop I'd play him and Callum in the back row... if not should play Callum #2 and Eddie #1
I won't play prop, I'll play hooker if I don't play flanker. I reckon Narang Morris Dafter will be the front row. IIRC Narang did well for NZ.
That's what I said. In that case side could be: 1. Narang 2. Morris 3. Dafter 4. McDougal 5. Verigotta 6. Chung 7. C laing 8. Deane 9. Luffman 10. Ames 11. Farnsworth 12. Orr 13. Graham 14. Logan 15. Blunder Backrow difficult to choose tstl.
If we have a trial there would be flankers playing all around the scrum, because they could end up being needed.
Yeh it's awkward because QLD players who don't make the Autralian side are at a dis-advantage because they dont get to play against GB or NZ.
Um, I had a better provincial series then Orr IMO. My recnt good form should deffers put me ahead of that fool.