1. Crusaders - 88.60 2. Stingrays - 85.38 3. Sticky Wickets - 83.89 4. Cyclones - 83.64 5. Vipers - 83.63 6. Pumas - 83.29 7. Ravens - 82.69 8. Gamblers - 80.02 Surprising.
Haha, there is so little between third and 7th. If the Ravens played Orr instead of Shriram they'd jump from 7th to 3rd. If this was said about any active member other than Paddy they'd ram it down the selector's throat.
Crusaders - 5 batsmen, 1 keeper, 2 bowling allrounders, 3 bowlers Stingrays - 5 batsmen, 1 keeper, 1 batting allrounder, 2 bowling allrounders, 2 bowlers Sticky Wickets - 3 batsmen, 2 keepers, 2 batting allrounders, 1 bowling allrounder, 3 bowlers Cyclones - 4 batsmen, 1 keeper, 1 batting allrounder, 2 allrounders, 3 bowlers Vipers - 5 batsmen, 1 keeper, 2 allrounders, 3 bowlers Pumas - 4 batsmen, 1 keeper, 2 batting allrounders, 1 bowling allrounder, 3 bowlers Ravens - 4 batsmen, 1 keeper, 1 batting allrounder, 2 allrounders, 3 bowlers Gamblers - 5 batsmen, 1 keeper, 1 batting allrounder, 4 bowlers
I reckon stingrays have the best balance, Vipers sacrifice a little bowling for a little bit more batting.
Denton under-achieves. The system thinks he'll go better than he actually does. Opposite worked for LL last season. He looks good on paper ATM as he had a good Season 8 but his career stats drag him down in a formula-based analysis like this; he's the reason you're in that middle group I think.
Me and Lover having not the greatest careers figures **** us up, but I avg low 30s last 2 season, and Lover dominates as an opener as we found out, so doesn't do us must justice in the rankings.
I think our balance is good when you consider our batting allrounder would get into most sides on his batting alone, so overs a fantastic 6th bowling option, and that one of our allrounders would make a lot of sides on his bowling alone.
