Why he's an all rounder who's just starting off like I sad he'll get better... look at Devonshire he was averaging 60 in his first season and he's a pure all-rounder. Logan is streets ahead of him compared to him at the start of his career.
This is purely bowling though. Devonshires bowling isnt what makes him so good. But I agree that he is better than Nova in bowlign alone anyway.
If I was the Stickies I would be bowling Nova ahead of Logan, presuming Nova is playing in their 1st XI.
That is why I said if Nova is playing in their 1st XI. What would be the point in having Nova in their side if they are going to bowl Logan ahead of him. I was under the impression from something posted earlier that Nova was in the first XI but that may have been a list of their bowlers and just skim read it wrong.
That was Incey saying they might play Nova inplace of Humble/Denton. Logan would be 3rd seamer at home if they played 3 spinners. He would still be 6th choice bowler.
I would say a big part of how the Clones attack goes this season could be the 3rd specialist bowler, that will come from the Brumbies. If they can step up to the BS level and do well then our bowling attack could do well, how Emm goes will have an important role too.
C Man (4th) L Lover (31st) JP Wilkinson (10th) AD Hunt (19th) SA Flack (37th) KD Jones (54th) RJ Centin (22nd) - If he signs PF Oz (27th) AJ Izett (43rd) J Ono (45th) DA Astele (94th) K Bovver (109th)
To start with yeah. Ridd isnt miles behind him and McDougall could well put himself into contention with a bigger role in ALC this season. If Tait doesnt step up we have other guys in the Brumbies that could step up.
Quality player to backup or even slot into firsts if form is poor of one of our top 4 bowlers, plus you stole him from us only to play him in seconds after awhile
