Multiple Season Contracts

Discussion in 'CricSim Cricket' started by Boobidy, Jun 1, 2009.

  1. nz0003 JR Denton

    I dont see why this shouldnt happen tbh.
     
  2. Wilson SB Wilson

    Yeah, I think this is unnecessary.
     
  3. Ged GEC King

    Because players might not want to be at a club but be forced to stay.
     
  4. Speirz DG Speirs

    We've had the same issue with a one season contract tbh.
     
  5. Mousey AJ Son

    Shouldn't sign a 2 season contract unless your 100% certain. I'm for it. If you want to leave in the middle and the president won't let you too bad.
     
  6. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Yeah, they obviously wouldn't be compulsory.
     
  7. Wilson SB Wilson

    Theres dead set nothing wrong with the one season contracts we currently have.
     
  8. Mousey AJ Son

    Yeah. And clubs will only offer them to their elite members, so why not?
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2009
  9. Mousey AJ Son

    But it'll just be another option. No need to use it if you don't want to.
     
  10. Speirz DG Speirs

    The amount of clubs collapsing suggests otherwise.
     
  11. Wilson SB Wilson

    Lol, thats not to do with one season contracts, nor will two season or more contracts fix that. That problem is from shithouse management.

    The fact of the matter is, its pointless. Players who are likely to agree to 2 or more season contracts are players who dont need to sign such things as their signature is arguably that clubs. Younger, hotter properties who this is intended for, probably wont want to sign them.
     
  12. Speirz DG Speirs

    I disagree. If, for instance, the Allstars had Manera on a two-season deal when the Ravens came in, I doubt he'd break his deal with the Allstars meaning his leadership and activity would've stayed with the Allstars as well. Clubs could use it to make sure they've got enough time to bring someone else through if a senior member is planning on leaving.
     
  13. Ged GEC King

    Exactly. It's stupid. There's no point to it afaic. The only ones that will sign big deals are the loyal ones anyway.
     
  14. BoyBlunder BOY Blunder

    No I think this is a good idea tbh. It gives stability to teams who might look for a long term investment and offer a 2 season contract to 2 players for one spot, one says he only wants one year the other agrees to it, who would you take?

    I'm all for it. If you don't like them, then don't use them tbh.
     
  15. Ged GEC King

    And manero would have been playing where he didn't want to.
     
  16. Speirz DG Speirs

    I don't know how he feels about it, but I reckon he'd have been perfectly happy to see out his contract and then move on, with someone like Humble in his place.
     
  17. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    LOL @ Humble running the AllStars.
     
  18. Speirz DG Speirs

    Or Julian. Humble was the only ex-Allstar who is still active other than the main ones that I could think of.
     
  19. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Who the **** would let Julian run a club....Wait wut.
     
  20. Wilson SB Wilson

    Dont be too hard on yourself. Its only because your incapable.
     

Share This Page