Those aren't the only criteria though; people have been picking teams based on what they'd like to start a club with. Either members who are good on the field, off it or a mixture of both. If they don't like you, they aren't going to want you in their subforum.
King and I are both more active and alot better than Julian, so by your logic one of us should have been picked over him. Which is what you're kicking a stink about.
I went and checked the OP and it doesn't explicitly mention "personality" or anythhing like that but it does say about a bunch of members that you'd like to start a new club with so it makes sense to consider personality. I don't know the history of sides you've been in but it's possible that you haven't been in a subforum with some of the people that have the largest disagreements with you? Or maybe it's not that they dislike you, it's just that they'd prefer an alternative to you.
Julian has more posts then both of you I think, and his activity is a lot higher than yours and possibly Geds too. Haven't paid attention to who has listed me or not so I can't comment.
Errr no it's not. Both Ged and I are higher than him on the activity rankings. So your team is flawed by your logic. Suck it up princess. Once again, another perfect example of just how often you are wrong.