Bannerman Shield Season 10 Premiership Discussion

Discussion in 'Bannerman Shield' started by Cribbage, Jun 4, 2011.

Page 9 of 21

  1. Callum CJ Laing

    That doesn't mean he will bowl both innings though does it?
     
    Callum, Jun 12, 2011
    #161

  2. El Nino J Torres

    If you didn't want them to bowl why would you put a number beside them then, I would think unless you roll them pretty quickly all bowlers instructed to bowl would get a bowl.
     
    El Nino, Jun 12, 2011
    #162

  3. Callum CJ Laing

    I am not saying I don't want him to bowl but your 7th bowler should really be looked at unless you have a massive partnership developing. I am confident enough with him bowling against the Stickies on their pitch anyway.
     
    Callum, Jun 12, 2011
    #163

  4. Zohaib ZM Ikram

    Yeah the pitch will assist him a great deal you should actually say in your instrucutions that only bowl him if a massive partnership is ....
     
    Zohaib, Jun 12, 2011
    #164

  5. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    He will only get a bowl if they go 550+, no need for a 7th bowler to be named.
     
    Boobidy, Jun 12, 2011
    #165

  6. Farhat AM Farhat

    Numbers are there for orders only, doesn't mean they will bowl.
     
    Farhat, Jun 12, 2011
    #166

  7. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    There is no point naming it, IMO. I wasn't named a bowler in the \_/ but I came on and delivered when our shit cunt bowlers couldn't take any wickets, as usual.
     
    Boobidy, Jun 12, 2011
    #167

  8. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Can't wait to play the Stickies at their ground.
     
    Boobidy, Jun 12, 2011
    #168

  9. Farhat AM Farhat

    There is a point when you want him to bowl before Gonzo in the 2nd innings.
     
    Farhat, Jun 12, 2011
    #169

  10. Verigoat S Verigotta

    Should bowl before Gonzo in the first :whistling:
     
    Verigoat, Jun 12, 2011
    #170

  11. RyanG R Gee

    Nah donkey, nah donkey. Mine kingdom for an donkey.
     
    RyanG, Jun 13, 2011
    #171

  12. Eds E Ames

    :laughing:
     
    Eds, Jun 13, 2011
    #172

  13. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Yeah, the balance of our side means our keeper is allowed to be a shit bat. Webber's better than most/all the number 8s in the comp so it's a strength rather than a weakness.

    Maybe Skippos was talking about his actual keeping though? It was terrible in the one Care Cup game we played. That would definitely be a weakness if it continued like that, although it's a small sample size.
     
    Cribbage, Jun 13, 2011
    #173

  14. Skippos SM Morgan

    Kinda yeah kinda no RE: what I was talking about

    as a number 8 > everybody but in terms of being the keeper batsman he doesn't. I guess your structure accomodates that weakness though, but I'm sure you'd prefer almost every other BS keeper....and his keeping was woef in the care cup so probably won't continue but could be a liability.
     
    Skippos, Jun 13, 2011
    #174

  15. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Yeah it doesn't work like that though. If you're looking at the batting lineup, you judge everyone by the position they're batting in, not whether they can do other stuff. The batting ability of our #8 is fine. Damo's a potential weakness, and Webber if he keeps like crap. Other than that we're all good.
     
    Cribbage, Jun 13, 2011
    #175

  16. Farhat AM Farhat

    Wth? Worms reference?
     
    Farhat, Jun 13, 2011
    #176

  17. Cribbage RG Cribb

    He's pissed off his face.
     
    Cribbage, Jun 13, 2011
    #177

  18. Skippos SM Morgan

    probably just me but for some reason I think tarty is a bit of a weakness/liability despite his good last season.
     
    Skippos, Jun 13, 2011
    #178

  19. RyanG R Gee

    Hey yeah! Worms was awsun back in the day
     
    RyanG, Jun 13, 2011
    #179

  20. Farhat AM Farhat

    Back in the day? Me n my mates downloaded it on ps3 and play it online.
     
    Farhat, Jun 13, 2011
    #180
Page 9 of 21

Share This Page