You said they did a good job apart from maybe Gallen and Cronk. You didn't want Gallen sin binned ffs, on the grounds that foul play should be dealt with by the judiciary rather than on-field. Thus I'm questioning how you can include Gallen in a list of possible indictments against the referees, whilst still maintaining the aforementioned position.
One is what I want. One is what the rules & interpretations are now. Like talking to a 4 year old sometimes ffs.
It's not really any different from me saying I think two man steals should be legal and then turning around and saying the referee did a poor job because he missed three obvious steals. What Magic thinks the rules and standard interpretations should be has no real relevance to how good a job he thinks the referees did of upholding the reality.
Bullshit distinction. You stated after the game that Origin gives more leniency, in defence of the decision to keep him on the field. Yes it is because Magic argued that the precedent in Origin allowed for what Gallen did. Your analogy is false.
Don't care I'm basically telling you and Magic to give it a rest! No wonder cunts are leaving this forum and getting on with their lives
My mate just bought a ticket for this game of ticketek... say what? I thought it was sold out. Was contemplating going up with Incey to watch Woods debut but the ticket prices on eBay were fucking ridiculous.
Myles seems like a good cunt, was on abc radio last night not getting drawn into the shit slinging match at all. Pretty much said he had no major qualms with what went down in game 1 and was looking forward to getting stuck into game 2.
It's purely a gut feeling. A double might be over the top, but I'm confident of him scoring one and getting talked up in the media for having a good game.