Just by the by The firefox search doesn't seem to be compatible with the new site, at least for me anyway, dont know if its the same for others
Sure its not like one of those mythical objects that if you know the right place to look, its very real indeed? Like in tomb raider?
Definitely not. I feel like I need to find a club where I'd stand a chance of being the standout seconds bowler else I'm gonna be stuck in some horrific cyclones pacers rut.
Changing people's name is causing havoc for RUSim. I hadn't factored this in to my build, dammit. Something to add to the to-do list.
Yo Cribb, was wondering if I could have a forum name change to just Doog. Haven't swam competitively in a long time and don't really intend to either, seems a little bit pointless having it there. If its too much trub I don't mind though.
Just to say Mouse and now Smith don't appear on our HC ratings page. I noticed Narang did move to the Stickies. Not a massive thing but just thought I would point it out to you.
There might even be more than 11 contracted "3rd eleven" players. Might only need to give 7/8 players a pseudo-contract. But I guess the reason to do it is to remove the disincentive for teams to sign > 22 players.
Ah. I see. Any ways round that? Or could you play these rookies against Ireland or something like that? Well, presumably not as Ireland would smash 'em, but some very low ranked team you have in the database.
It's pretty tempting to suggest expansion to 10 teams and just have a weak ALC for a season, but I'm guessing the gap would be a bit too big to bridge. I just can't believe that there's no room for a guy like McNeill anywhere. So, it would work for new guys who have no simming average, you just have no formula to work out a simming average for unsigned inactives that they could play against? Hmmm.