DWTA. If you've got a team mentality of attack (which happens in T20), good bowlers will pick up wickets regularly. Wickets falling frequently & chances for big scores > being 120/3 after 20 overs
52 wickets have been taken in 6 T20 innings, that is too many. The least wickets to have been lost is 5, but teams have been bowled out on 3 occasions.
Possibly too many wickets being taken early on opposed to too many runs full stop? Usually at least 2 of the top 6 score a decent chunk of runs.
Yeah, but people bat aggressively in real life T20 and don't lose this many wickets. That's my point.
Yeah run rates are slightly too high and teams are losing too many wickets. It's just slightly too aggressive in general.
Take for example, in the history of T20Is and 187 games only 12 have had 18 or more wickets taken. We've had 2 in the first 3 games. On average, 13 wickets are taken per T20I, we're losing more than 17. Small sample size so far, but sufficient enough for me to say "too many wickets are bing lost".