Had no problem with that tbh. If he had been it in more he'd have only been sat around crying or delivery stupid one-liners in his charming cockey way.
yeah same for mine. not that identity was in any way poor, but supremacy was just better in every way save for some of the nausea-inducing camerawork as for tdkr i found it kind of meh tbh a useful post this, providing evidence that you can indeed be categorically wrong on movie-related matters
Alfred should have been the villain in the 3rd film. Criminals start dying in Gotham, Batman is in on the case and threatens a few rogues to find out more. They're all shit scared because they keep turning out dead. Low and behold Michael Caine ends up being the one assassinating them to protect Bruce. Would be amazing if done right.
That is seriously not even a bad idea. Feel that Dark Knight is the best "Batman" film. Lots of night-time, stealthy sequences, memorable showdown sequences, fairly well-paced. Begins isn't bad, but origin stories are always the least interesting because there's so much to cram in. Rises felt overly long to me, and Batman in the daytime doesn't work. He just looks stupid.
I didn't care for Rises. I thought Bane was kinda gay, like is he supposed to sound like a gay Hannibal Lecter? Heath Ledger might be overrated after dying, but he was really awesome as the Joker. Batman Begins was pretty cool, I find it difficult to buy Liam Neeson as a villain (though Scarecrow was pretty cool). Katie Holmes just can't act too.