Rules on who you can pick

Discussion in 'The CPL Rugby that never was.' started by Cribbage, Sep 17, 2009.

Page 8 of 11

  1. Incey BC Jacobs

    :laugh: All players that have played NRL/ESL in the past 2 or 3 seasons should have been eligible. Players that are lesser known would be risky because of there unknown playing abilities.
     
    Incey, Oct 21, 2009
    #141

  2. Ged GEC King

    Given the sl stat site is so good, I don't see why they couldn't have all been available.
     
    Ged, Oct 21, 2009
    #142

  3. Colesy BL Hornby

    Yeah exactly.
     
    Colesy, Oct 21, 2009
    #143

  4. Lukic L Popovic

    The thing I'd hate about the redraft is that all the sleepers would be known.

    But then again, it would be more like an NFL fantasy draft tbh which is ok.
     
    Lukic, Oct 21, 2009
    #144

  5. Hunter AD Hunt

    Redraft would be the dumbest thing as we are 70% through it already.
     
    Hunter, Oct 21, 2009
    #145

  6. Ged GEC King

    **** all this shit **** talk.
    It's simple, the people that picked ineligible players ****ed up and this is the consequence of that. Repick now.
     
    Ged, Oct 21, 2009
    #146

  7. Benny BS Read

    Whats teh Super league stats site?
     
    Benny, Oct 21, 2009
    #147

  8. Benny BS Read

    First time in ages that I agree with you.
     
    Benny, Oct 21, 2009
    #148

  9. Colesy BL Hornby

    its a secret
     
    Colesy, Oct 21, 2009
    #149

  10. Ged GEC King

    Just go to the super league official website and click on stats.
     
    Ged, Oct 21, 2009
    #150

  11. Lukic L Popovic

    Why though, I thought a game for your country was good enough to count. No one denied me then, so it was an eligible pick up until now. Why should I lose my 14th pick, for no fault at that time.
     
    Lukic, Oct 21, 2009
    #151

  12. Colesy BL Hornby

    Because it was a shit pick.
     
    Colesy, Oct 21, 2009
    #152

  13. Ged GEC King

    You were wrong. It clearly stated in the rules, TEST MATCH.
    Just because we didn't notice it means shit all. The only reason that I noticed a few was because we were gonna pick em but couldn't.
     
    Ged, Oct 21, 2009
    #153

  14. Lukic L Popovic

    What is considered a test and isn't. For all I knew, it was...
     
    Lukic, Oct 21, 2009
    #154

  15. Ged GEC King

    It's not that hard to find out if it was classed as a test or not. Usually it's any match between Australia, NZ, England, and sometimes France. It's not our fault that you didn't and you now pay the consequences. Unlucky.
     
    Ged, Oct 21, 2009
    #155

  16. Colesy BL Hornby

    I'll trade you Ruben Wiki for your next pick.
     
    Colesy, Oct 21, 2009
    #156

  17. Lukic L Popovic

    NVM....

    It was Wales, wrong player...
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2009
    Lukic, Oct 21, 2009
    #157

  18. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Nah, there was actually. The new rules have stated that only Tests against Australia and New Zealand count, and that players who debut after I started this thread don't count... but the rule that it had to be a Test was always there, so you have to re-pick.
     
    Cribbage, Oct 21, 2009
    #158

  19. Colesy BL Hornby

    HAHAHAH
     
    Colesy, Oct 21, 2009
    #159

  20. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Nah, don't agree. It's not my job or anyone else's job to triple-check the eligiblity of every single person's player. If you pick an ineligible player because you don't read the rules properly and then you get found out later that's your own fault and you should re-pick.
     
    Cribbage, Oct 21, 2009
    #160
Page 8 of 11

Share This Page