Rules on who you can pick

Discussion in 'The CPL Rugby that never was.' started by Cribbage, Sep 17, 2009.

  1. Ged GEC King

    they were just lucky....not the other way around.
     
  2. Lukic L Popovic

    If Australia played against India in a test match, with any line-up it is still a test match, if you want to get into technicalities.

    The status of the match over those who are playing the match decide whether it is a test match or not.

    If Australia plays the Australia A side in cricket against India, it doesn't all of a sudden lose it's status as a test match.
     
  3. Ged GEC King

    But that's the reason that it's not classed as a test match. Because it is used as a warm up match/ tour match and isn't taken seriously. If you want to get technical, it was not a 'test' of the players ability.
     
  4. Lukic L Popovic

    If it's a 3 test series and Australia comes out and plays that line-up by choice in the opinion that it could be potentially better than another option. It doesn't all of a sudden become a 2 test match series, by your logic. It remains a 3 match test series, whether at full strength or not, it is still a test of a players ability. Every match is.
     
  5. Tartmaster AJ James

    **** you're stupid.
     
  6. Lukic L Popovic

    Look, 1. I'm arguing because I like arguing.
    2. I'll always argue whether wrong or right
    3. I feel that I shouldn't be penalized 15 or so rounds in picking over the lacking of ruling of a power aside from my own. Either I keep him, or I get to pick anyone from that pick on wards.
     
  7. Ged GEC King

    Oi Lukic, Australia v. Ireland a test match in cricket?
     
  8. Tartmaster AJ James

    Or you shut the **** up and do what you're told.
    You ****ed up, you pay for it.
     
  9. Lukic L Popovic

    The ICC has clearly set out their 8 test playing nations or such.

    The RLIF to my knowledge hasn't...
     
  10. Cribbage RG Cribb

    No, basically. Live with it. I'm not going to change my mind; I disagree wholeheartedly.

    You ****ed up by picking an ineligible player. You ****ed up. You pay the price.
     
  11. Incey BC Jacobs

    Can Fungus pick two now? 1. To Replace Tickle and 2. His pick for this round.
     
  12. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Yeah, but there's every possibility Scarbrook wouldn't have played if the match actually meant something and had Test status. The match wasn't deemed to have Test status - it was just a warmup for something - so they gave random ****s who wouldn't have otherwise played a game.

    At the end of the day, I don't care what you say, it's not going to change whether he's eligible or not. He's not eligible. Move on or I'll just drop kick your team out altogether.
     
  13. Lukic L Popovic

    If someone eats a cake that wasn't for them, and 2 hours later someone comes up to them and says give me the cake back, what are they supposed to do? Vomit it up?
     
  14. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Yeah. I don't see why you have to ask this question, it's pretty ****ing obvious.
     
  15. Cribbage RG Cribb

    One more post and you're gone. I'll take your access away. Let it go.
     
  16. Lukic L Popovic

    I'll be honest, I don't give a shit about Scarsbrook.

    I just want to have my pick that round back :p
     
  17. Tartmaster AJ James

    Copy cat.
     
  18. Incey BC Jacobs

    Lol. Dont give me lip Cribb.
     
  19. Cribbage RG Cribb

    It's not going to happen though. I'd rather gauge my eyes out than give you that pick back.
     
  20. Lukic L Popovic

    Ok, so can I make a replacement pick now?

    Seeing as through technicality, that pick was ineligible and 24 hours passed since it so we'd assume using the 24 hour rule my pick was continually put off by the rest of the draft, giving me the right to pick now?
     

Share This Page