What does any of that have to do with reading ? If you are really that thick than I might as well tell you what I was getting at.
Teagles are in the final obv. Either you can't read a ladder or can't read that I play for the Donkehs, or you are retared. Whatever it is, you suit the Hawks.
I don't want to take sides, but the Hawks did use an Indian for a goal kicker. You'd think that's a massive disadvantage.
Exhibit a) here. Once again the example uses a completely baseless argument to try and participate. The example here is well aware that his target has dedicated paragraphs of literature supporting his personal arguments of why the Hawks are the best, yet the example, rather than using intelligence to debate something useful, decides to just ignore this simple fact and argue for the sake of arguing. This behaviour is usually produced by an ironic ignorance that the example believes everyone else is on his level of intelligence and will not discover this anomaly in his argument, despite its glaring obviousness.
Having been on the same side as AVA in recent arguments, I can confirm his shitness. The no.1 rule of arguing is keep on topic and don't bring irrelevent personal shit into it.
I don't need to comfirm my intelligence by arguing on an internet forum. If i'm not in the mood for a well constructed arguement, but I am bored enough to want to **** around with people, i'll take the easy way out and throw out some bullshit lines that stir some shit, which you can see in this thread.
