Well, Montgomery was pretty jelly that Patton and the Americans were getting all the attention and recognition for their rapid gains further south and wanted some attention. And the Allied command wanted to utilise the airborne divisions they'd assembled before the war ended because you know...it'd be a waste if they didn't... The fact that the pre-D-Day airborne landings took months to plan despite being on a scale about 10% the size of Market Garden which was planned in a week says it all really. Landing your airborne troops 5-8 miles away from Arnhem bridge and expecting to maintain the element of surprise.
Getting back into the Koran tomorrow and going to try and read it all by next week. From the 70 odd pages I've read so far the idea of a 'religion of peace' really doesn't have a leg to stand on. I actually quoted this gem on someone calling it a religion of 'peace and love' today: ....In fact to says it's a 'religion of peace and love' is an out and out lie to what I've read. It's a religion of subservience and fear. There's a fair degree of intolerance in there too, at the beginning of the Koran it states that the Koran is 'the infallible word of god' then goes on to have such passages as 'when you meet the unbelievers strike off their heads and, when you have wreaked widespread slaughter among them, bind your captives tightly' (book of Muhammad). How you reconcile that with peace and love ill never know
I'm reding Junk by Burroughs atm. Not as brilliant as his spliced works but still enjoyable and ridiculously ahead of it's time.
Been reading some Peter Carey lately. The Booker prize winning Ned Kelly book was pretty solid, and I could see some common literary themes between that book and Eleanor Catton's The Luminaries Currently reading Illywhacker. Pretty good yarn so far, but hard to see where it's going.
My housemate last year was in love with the guy. Fun fact about Murakami though... he's now an online agony uncle
A great author for mine - even if his books are, for the most part, extremely similar to one another.
Have been about 100 pages into the first wheel of time book for the last couple of years. Should really get the rest of it. Just can never really be bothered
I wouldn't bother. It's not a bad series, but nothing ever really happens, and it just goes on and on forever, with much of the time spent with the characters travelling around aimlessly, and talking about how they will never understand women.
Ironically it's more boring than real life. Nah, I kid, there are some really good bits, but they inevitably come at the beginning and end of each volume, meaning you have to trudge through about 700 pages of dirge to get to them. Also, it's amusing how literally all of the female characters are the same (angry, aggressive, think they know better than everyone, but are actually stupid), but it doesn't make for a very good read. Apparently the author based every female character on his wife, for some stupid reason.
I have never read Animal Farm but I've heard it highly recommended from everyone who has mentioned it.
His books are very thought-provoking, but I have never actually enjoyed one, despite feeling enriched for having read them.
Not a huge fan of Animal Farm but 1984 is one of my favourite books of all time. Down and Out in Paris and London is worth a read too.
About halfway through animal farm and am enjoying. I've got all his books in one big super book so will give Burmese days a crack next
Maybe I was too young when I read it.. but I swear 1984 was kinda.. boring? Namely the first half of the book.