Yeah, but if you were moderate you'd concede less runs per over but take less wickets so your average would be the same. It's not your aggressiveness that kills your average; it's the fact that you're mediocre.
Nah if we got Farny, Luffers wouldnt want you. We went for Farny along time before we even considered you. You would come into our team to improve our bowling.
Harsh... I actually think aggressive batsmen tend to have the higher averages in the BS. I'm sure Rob will come up with some stats to prove me wrong...
Is that not what you said last time... before raging we didnt contact you before you signed Yeh true. Better than Deane though.
Well lets have a look at the (serious) bowlers with First Class bowling averages under 28. AP Farnsworth - 22.44 - Aggressive SB Wilson - 25.43 - Aggressive DA Eggman - 26.30 - Moderate TG Bullpitt - 26.62 - Aggressive C Man - 27.24 - Aggressive You can't really say that being aggressive is hazardous to your average. It's hazardous to your economy rate and your ability to bowl long spells but that's it.