Who will win S10 Bannerman Shield?

Discussion in 'Bannerman Shield' started by HeathDavisSpeed, Jan 24, 2011.

?

Who will win the Bannerman Shield?

Poll closed Feb 7, 2011.

  1. Crusaders

    7 vote(s)
    12.3%

  2. Cyclones

    4 vote(s)
    7.0%

  3. Gamlers

    5 vote(s)
    8.8%

  4. Pumas

    6 vote(s)
    10.5%

  5. Ravens

    19 vote(s)
    33.3%

  6. Sticky Wickets

    3 vote(s)
    5.3%

  7. Stingrays

    2 vote(s)
    3.5%

  8. Vipers

    11 vote(s)
    19.3%
Page 3 of 8

  1. Eggman DA Eggman

    Edited
     
    Eggman, Jan 24, 2011
    #41

  2. morgieb MC Burridge

    We'll see, mate, we'll see.
     
    morgieb, Jan 24, 2011
    #42

  3. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    Wow thank goodness for you you aren't a bookie. Look at the poll, now i know it is slightly biased, but the ravens should clearly be shortest cause they have the most people willing to back them, so you pay them out less. Do you actually get how betting markets work?
     
    stupersteve03, Jan 24, 2011
    #43

  4. Eggman DA Eggman

    Yes, we will see the lack of performance from the gamblers.
     
    Eggman, Jan 24, 2011
    #44

  5. Athlai JJD Heads

    I think he might be taking this piss and 'gambling'
     
    Athlai, Jan 24, 2011
    #45

  6. morgieb MC Burridge

    Yeah in defence it was sorta biased and had more to do with how I saw the chances, reality is that Ravens would be much shorter and Gamblers and Vipers much longer.....

    Ravens $2.20
    Vipers $7.50
    Gamblers $11
    Crusaders $11
    Stingrays $16
    Cyclones $21
    Pumas $41
    Stickies $51

    Probably the better one tbh.
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2011
    morgieb, Jan 24, 2011
    #46

  7. Hughesy JM Hughes

    Whichever team has me in it will win so in this case it is the Vipers :p. I think that is enough to make us favourites.
     
    Hughesy, Jan 24, 2011
    #47

  8. 99* JJ Ritchie

    Gamblers - 101.26
    Crusaders - 95.35
    Vipers - 89.92
    Ravens - 89.02
    Stingrays - 87.15
    Cyclones - 85.37
    Stickies - 81.27
    Pumas - 79.62

    Says otherwise imo.

    Cribb to give updated ones to make me look bad
     
    99*, Jan 24, 2011
    #48

  9. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    How has that worked for you so far?
     
    stupersteve03, Jan 24, 2011
    #49

  10. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    Numbers are for gay people...
     
    stupersteve03, Jan 24, 2011
    #50

  11. Eggman DA Eggman

    Great odds for the Vipers, I'll put $10,000 on that and get a good return
     
    Eggman, Jan 24, 2011
    #51

  12. morgieb MC Burridge

    That's actually pretty interesting. Makes me surprised few people rate the Gamblers and to a lesser extent Saders.
     
    morgieb, Jan 24, 2011
    #52

  13. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    Really... are you really saying that... you must be blind boy. Just cause they aren't calling them definite winners doesn't mean they don't rate them at all. We don't all have to be in love with the gamblers like you. have another look and see how many people have gamblers as second or third...
     
    stupersteve03, Jan 24, 2011
    #53

  14. morgieb MC Burridge

    The gap between Gamblers and Ravens/Vipers > the gap between Ravens/Vipers and Pumas. Yet who's been backed more heavily? On paper we look like hot favourites yet we're seen as weaker than say the Ravens and the Vipers.

    Had we not sucked last season (which had a million players out of form and a much worse lineup) we'd be seen as hot favourites.

    I'm not saying that we're certainties to win the comp. But I do believe that we should be considered favourites.
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2011
    morgieb, Jan 24, 2011
    #54

  15. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    Slightly underrated is not the same as not rated...
     
    stupersteve03, Jan 24, 2011
    #55

  16. morgieb MC Burridge

    Pre season smack talk is used by everyone anyway.
     
    morgieb, Jan 24, 2011
    #56

  17. morgieb MC Burridge

    Yeah, not rated probably is a bit extreme, tbh.
     
    morgieb, Jan 24, 2011
    #57

  18. Athlai JJD Heads

    So so so dire.
     
    Athlai, Jan 24, 2011
    #58

  19. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    Good to see the boy can see reason :p
     
    stupersteve03, Jan 24, 2011
    #59

  20. PaulFromOz PF Oz

    Stringrays are pretty bad too.
     
    PaulFromOz, Jan 24, 2011
    #60
Page 3 of 8

Share This Page