I liked the move. As long as you don't go all retarded and try to defend a one point lead, I think it was a good call.
I don't get why they blow time off when Nathan Friend is injured they blow off time but Kennedy being injured doesn't result in the same outcome. And yeh I'm a sore loser but there's no difference.
Yeah, I could be wrong, but I think the only games in which they scored more points than the opposition, they won. And they haven't won without doing so yet. Someone check for me.
Yeah, I know that smartarses, what I meant was why they haven't scored as much. Apart from Carney, what's different to last season?
Carney, you're onto it. Carney = Banasta not at 5/8 = Points. 2011 same as 2009 in that manner, 2010 has the Carney/ non-Banasta factor.
The halves aren't working, need a spark to assist Pearce, aka Carney, not Anasta. And piss Riddell off. Even then though they're a good team, no excuse, Pearce and Anasta should be able to do better.
Braith is well and truly capable of playing five-eighth, but him and Pearce in the halves doesn't have much attacking spark.
