Doesn't it trouble you that you're like 50 and you have no capacity for contrition or self-criticism?
I didn't watch the game because I didn't realise that kiwi football games kick off at fucking midday the stupid backwards cunts.
Not at all. I am much closer to 40 than 50 and what exactly am I expected to be contrite and self-critical about? Let's summarise shall we (without resorting to insults ) You made a post saying "Melbourne vs Warriors is as lolworthy as St George vs Canberra." Firstly, yes I assumed you were talking about the game...and not any overall record. Despite having followed the game for many more years than you I am not such a league nerd that I am aware of any reputation that St George have for losing to Canberra. Secondly what you said about Melbourne v Warriors is complete bullshit anyway. Melbourne have won more games, as I have already pointed out. For these reasons I didn't comprehend your post and have freely admitted that. I even edited my post for you.
So you lasted three sentences before resorting to insults..... You don't have to be a league nerd. It's pretty commonly known. The commentators repeat it every time they play each other. All I was saying is that the Warriors seem to be a bit of a bogey team for the Storm. It was such an innocuous comment that was turned into a big blue because you misinterpreted it. All you had to do was admit that rather than being intransigent. Now you act like that's what you did but that's clearly not the case either. Anyway, let's get over it.
Those years of analyses really shining through. Just so you know Daley, Stuart and Meninga are coaches now and it's no longer the Winfield cup. Raiders have won 9 straight against the drags and something like 16 of the last 17 if my memory serves.
So how does that record compare to Warriors v Storm? It doesn't therefore it was a terrible comparison. I think you owe the forum and society in general an apology MF. Very misleading and upsetting.
