No, because he has only played FC it means he is untried, so you can't claim that he is a solid option yet. Read has been the top of the postcount ranks for 2 seasons now and has averaged 20 and 35. There is every reason that he'll average <40 yet again based on that. Glad to see you ignored the second part of my post as well. The truth does hurt.
I've already answered the second part of your post multiple times. Ok idiot, we aren't claiming Morgan to be awesome, we are just denying the fact he is shit. And as you just said, not much can be said after 2 games. And if our number 7 averages 35 I'll be pretty happy seeing our top 5 will all average above 40.
Since when have you answered it? Not once have you admitted yours is weaker, so you haven't done anything but deny the truth. Also, who is to say Benny wont average 20 again, which was my point. If he averages <30, which is a distinct possibility, he is shit.
I think Alessi is in for a huge season... considering we could play Nova or even another spinner (all rounder) at 9 probably gives us the best depth in the comp. Partially makes up for the fact we don't have a quality 3.
Who says Ged won't average over 40 like in season 4, or I won't average 35 like in season 6. You are calling someone shit IF he does something in the future? Wow, seriously wait for Ged to post something new so you can just reword it.
Who cares about number 8 ? Its like saying our team can bowl up to 8, After 5 it doesn't mean shit. Oh and AVA how is their 6 and 7 shit ? I'd seriously like to know. You and Ged have to be the dumbest ****s when it comes to Cricsim. Ged you say at one stage that you didn't think the Rays had better batting than the Gamblers, Then Rob comes out with a gay formula and then your opinion changes ? LOL you really think Farny's batting average is going to stay that good after what ?.. 1 and half seasons of Bannerman Shield. Same with Yates and Weaver, these guys aren't as good as your making them out to be because of one decent season with the bat **** head... and no they won't stay that good cause you want them too, so you can get off your knees and get out from under Robs desk. Ava. Stop sucking dick.
You are seriously mocking me for predicting the future when you are doing the same with every post you make? Ok buddy.
You've said that already. I had a discussion with the cricket council and asked them if they could remove it from the game, but it looks like it's an important part of cricket.
Yes it does... Devonshire averaged 42 in season 8 batting at #8, helped us win a lot of matches. Of course it ****ing matters. I've already explained how their #6 hasn't played BS and it's debatable if he is ready, and yet he is beinng thrown into the deep end, and that their #7 has every chance of averaging 20. Just like how your whole batting lineup is shit.
Are you ****ing stupid? No shit its an important part, its importance is massively over-rated in this sim though. **** me you've turned into the biggest retard lately.
Over the past two seasons, he has averaged an average of 27, sounds pretty shit to me. Oh, and you have predicted Taylor will smash it after averaging 50 last season with the ball, yours is much worse.
Our number 7 has a chance of averaging 20? This doesn't seem stupid when typing it? Oi Tyson, there is a chance you will average 35 with the ball in season 9. Crusaders have pretty shit bowling.
**** you are the shittest person to argue with. The Saders batting has nothing to do with it but you bring it us to get one over Tyson. Yeah take that Luke!
Nah I'll average 54 cause we are underrated and I'll ask to bat 8. 8 Is the most important in the game. No matter how good your top 5 is number 8 will win it for you. Number 8, Number 8, Number 8, Underrated. Number 8.
