I said I think it may have grazed the ground. It's very hard to tell and it obviously would've been called a try if Maxwell went upstairs with a try ruling. He's closer and probably had a better angle. To me it's irrelevant. The bloke was grounded and had a second dig. Okay maybe at worst it was forward. Still think it was flat. And as I said, Penrith had two terrible calls, along with some other minor ones. Do they count? There's plenty of people on here who would say Casty was tackled and the ball from Idris was flat. That's not unreasonable. Lukic came on and said he thought Pearce's try was an obstruction. You don't see me saying that. Even Robinson didn't go as far as to pin-point one of the refs and say he gifted it to the opposition. You think that's reasonable? I think it's sour grapes. Obviously you're pretty upset about tonight's loss and have accumulated quite a bit of sand in that vagina so I'll let you dust yourself off and we'll speak again later. If you really didn't want to have a good old whinge about the refs then you wouldn't have.
Up the Panthers! Cop it GYR. Hope the arrogant cunts and their fuckwit supporters go out in straight sets.
For the record, I watched the Casty try again and Maxwell said held a couple of seconds before so the penalty was fair.
They actually played exactly as I expected, terrible attack once again close to the line. Roosters were just pathetic and gave the game away.
Yeah, saying it'd be absurd to pick him is exactly the same as calling for him to be picked Brooks is good; it's a matter of when rather than if. But we have those selection processes for a reason. Moylan was different altogether.
Can't remember if that's the one I'm thinking of but yeah there was a late shot by JWH. He's a filthy cunt. And a moron to boot.
Which begs the question did he deserve to be penalised? In the modern game these days the refs allow them to go back and play the ball if they continue on after held is called, why not for Casty?
