I don't think anyone will argue with that. They earned the field position they received and with that should have won the game. Queensland won by 2 points, and NSW butchered at least 4 sets on the line before they had even started. The halves have to go.
If really pushed to answer, I don't think QLD would have won last night if Gallen and Hayne had played. Credit to us though, we can only beat who NSW put in front of us and to do it from 1 game down with two matches in Sydney is remarkable. There's only been about half a dozen or so instances in history when the team that loses Game I has come back to win the series. This current QLD side has now done it three times.
I don't think it is a big ask at all. I can't think of any good reason for not selecting Carney at halfback.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/V-HnJDrMqnY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Hodges's try is a perfect example what I was talking about the other day regarding the difference between five-eighth and halfback in the modern system of split halves. Thurston shifts over to the right, around behind Hodges. Creates doubt in the minds of the defenders because he's a playmaker.
That's what made it all the more dreadful imo. Had all the ball, all the field position and they got a stuttering McManus try and a solo crack from Merrin. They looked like they had absolutely no idea out there. I've never seen a team attack with such a lack of pace and intensity as I saw from NSW last night when in QLD's 20. It's as if they didn't run through a single attack move all camp.
Farah is the worst offender when it comes to this. He'll stand there with his arms wide even before the ball carrier is near the tryline.
74th minute - Absolutely huge play. NSW making great metres after scoring that try. Got to QLD's 35 on 4th, a good straight hard run or a well-executed shift gets them in range against a tiring QLD defence. And Pearce bullets a pass which ricochets off Dugan's shoulder and goes back 15m. All the Blues have to rush back onside behind the play-the-ball on last. It leads to a long range bomb which Slater takes 10m out and gets fouled in the air. All the momentum and all the running and it's halted by one terrible pass.
Could you expand on this a little? Are you saying that the 5/8 is the playmaker and the half isn't? For example I don't think you see Cronk play like what you've just described JT doing, yet Cronk would be still considered a playmaker ...yes? In my mind a 5/8 still plays more of a roaming/running game and the half plays/looks after the middle of the field. I know there's more than a few saying that the modern day halves are basically interchangeable and play the same kind of role......I'm not so sure.
A bit harsh on Parker ...but yes, it didn't look good. I was so relieved that it didn't cost QLD the game, because it would have been so unfair on Parker to have to live with that.
They're both playmakers. What I'm saying is it's not as clear cut as some people think with regard to split halves. A lot of people think there is very little difference between half and five-eighth. One plays left, one plays right and they're both first receivers. As you said though, you don't see Cronk doing what Thurston did in that play. And that's one of the main differences. Split halves helps team structure but it weakens creativity because it limits your ability to get your best creators wider and in more space.