Edited (Heef does making a heap of subs at once make a negative impact at all) Game 1 1 Ishan Narang 2 Eddie Morris 3 David Dafter 4 James McDougal 5 Sam Verigotta 6 Simon Laing 7 Callum Laing 8 Brett Gemmell 9 Jake Luffman A Ed Ames B Al Farnsworth C Steve Cambridge D Paddy Orr E Andrew James F Bobby Blunder 16 Jonny Ridd (on if Narang is playing like a shunt from 60 minutes onwards) 17 Slippery Dong (bring on if one of the locks is shunting from 60 minutes on or if winning by at least 17 points) 18 Ben Manera (bring on for S Laing at 60 minutes) 19 Marcuss Deane (bring on for Gemmell at 60 minutes) 20 Luke Pilgrim (bring on for a half back if they're shunt after 50 minutes, if Ames move Luffman to 10, or for Luffman after 60 minutes if winning by at least 10 points) 21 Sam Graham (bring on for Orr at 60 minutes, unless Orr is owning, then for Cambridge) 22 Jordan Logan (bring on for Farnsworth at 60 minutes) Designated Place Kicker: Luffman (2. Ames) Designated Tactical Kicker: Blunder (2. Ames, 3. Luffman) Injury Subs 1 du Toit 2 Manera, C Laing to 2 3 du Toit 4 Dong 5 Dong 6 Manera 7 Manera 8 Deane 9 Pilgrim A Pilgrim, Luffman to 10 B Logan C Graham D Graham E Logan F Logan Tactics: Dry - open Damp - default Wet - closed
Oh god. This North/South eligibility is a pain in the derriere. I will have to check what Cribb and I discussed, but I think Quaggas could be right. Nope.
It does if you're taking all your best players off at once. Phillip Saint-Andre yet to twig to this though
Trying to mirror CricSim for North/South... ...So, Prez, Quaggas and Vimesy are Souths players not Norths. So, you need a replacement for Quaggas.
They shat on us upfront in the last game, and losing Eddie is not going to help us. So really we have two options. We either play 3 props and hope to correct it, or cut our losses and hope to outplay them everywhere else. Personally I'm more inclined to the latter. Start Callum in the front row and play an open game. Target Escath with the extra flanker we'll have and rack up the points by exploiting their weak outside defence.
Yeah I'm inclined to go with me playing at #2. I think my skill quality is so far above the other options that even me playing in a less favoured position is better than the alternatives. Ridd isn't nearly at the right standard to play in primary position, let alone playing out of position.