This statement reveals how little you actually know about RL. Invoking try scoring should be the last resort. And it's usually the first for people who know less than fuck all about RL. Not sure if you realise, but wingers are there to score tries. Ashley Graham has scored about 100 FG tries. Doesn't mean he should be playing FG.
You claimed that Vautuvei made 3 times as many errors as the average winger because they kick to him more. Where is the evidence that would explain such a huge disparity between his ball control and that of every other winger in the game?
Better not do the same as last week and blow this 18 point lead. MF, Vatuvei basically won NZ a World Cup on his own. Was player of the tournament. Sure he makes a lot of errors but he more than makes up for it in offence and is much loved and widely respected on and off the field. Do you think Bluey would have given him the captaincy if his teammates thought he was a muppet? He might not be the sharpest knife in the drawer but he's a good role model for young polynesians in NZ, has a likeable personality and good sense of humour. Get off his back and try watching him play a few games without that ridiculous bias you have against him. Don't hate what you can't imitate.
I'd say attacking your wife is just as common, insofar as Cricsim is concerned. Whether I have a sister or not is irrelevant. It's blatantly hypocritical for you to cry about your family members being attacked, (which I consciously avoid doing, unlike many other people on here), and then directing the same sort of gutter snipe at the family members of others, existent or not. Saying it's common trash talk doesn't change anything.
How many wingers have a try average of 17 a season? Most of the tries he scores other wingers couldn't. Of course he should be playing FG you moron. He's one of the best wingers in the gmae
Yep, and the good ones will do that. I mean take Perrett and Vatuvei for example. They've both played 150 games and yet Manu is more than 50 tries up on him, coincidence?
Stop. Just stop. You cannot be serious. Oh, well, if he's much loved I guess I should change my opinion. Probably not. But what on earth do the opinions of his team mates have to do with our opinions of him as a player? That sort of argument could be applied to just about anyone captaining in FG. Again, what is the relevance? I don't doubt the bloke is a good role model (I have no reason to think otherwise either but I'm willing to grant it for the sake of argument), but that has as much to do with his ability as a player as the colour of his boots. I've been watching him for nearly 10 years now. He is the encapsulation of everything I hate about the game I've been playing and watching and loving for 20 years. He is completely one-dimensional. Relies entirely on being the "big kid", has virtually no ball skills, and can barely hang onto the pill. The only thing worse than all of this, are the apologetics that attack-junkies fabricate for him.
No. It's not a coincidence. There's no doubt Vatuvei is a better finisher than Perrett. And if I only gave a shit about attack, like you blokes, then we wouldn't be arguing. Alas I don't.
lol, Williams is very much like Vatuvei. Has a cult following, has the ball skills of a blind penguin, but he scores tons of tries (has a better strike rate than Vatuvei) so cunts think he's good and he plays rep footy.
He kinda picks Ash Graham for his FG side every week if fit. And tbf to Vatuvei's FG credentials, Cleary and Bluey pick him every week he is fit, both are fairly good judges of what it takes to be a FG winger, perhaps not as good a judge as you though.
