Trades thread

Yeah but kearney can go to Fullback as he > Wellens and I can trade off Wellens + others. The key to the trade was getting a 1,6,7,9 good enough to start at my club so I could trade off my current one. Which means I can now trade Wellens off if need be or keep him and play Kearney at 7. Having the best 6 and the best 9 more than makes up for a makeshift half.

 

M.Rogers- Black Sheep
M.Cooper- Sharks

 

but I probably wouldn't of done Wallace for Cooper .

Cause If Rogers doesn't work I can just move him to the centres I can't move Wallace to the centres .

 

Um how so?

Lockyer one was worth it as it meant I could have the best 6 and the best 9 in the same side at the expense of someone who is hot and cold and someone I had as a makeshift half who is really at fullback.

Geds one wasn't really needed but having Kearney now gives me multiple options with Rogers coming in. + I got Bolton

Rogers for Cooper suited me cause I have Pomers and Delaney still who will get the Job done and Rogers completes my dominance in the halves who is also a damn good centre could do the job on the wing aswell if need be.

 

Having Lockyer + Smith = sex already.

I'm all about coverage atm. The more combinations I have open to choose from the more room I have to fix things. Wallace in the side would just mean I have a set standard 6,7,9 which isn't what I was really wanting.

 

Um Rogers will work in the halves, at 6 this season for GC he scored 8 Tries,9 LB, 10 LBA, 6 TryA. Looks like a more than capable half imagine his stats if he played more than 14 games there.

 

I get the point he's saying if Rogers absolutely fails in first few games I'll have to move him + find a new half + take out a centre.

Thought he was more having a snipe at Rogers ability of playing half IRL though therefore odds are he will fail in Lukics Opinion.