Hahah, you can try to get me on anything else. But trying to say I'm not the best is insane. Don't be bitter, Scott.
All I could see was the "<3". Thought was all that showed up. In that case you should stay at the Ravens.
The fact that was who they were playing with is over exaggerated. You should check how active they were over the period of signing with us and before it... Might find an answer there...
Lol, na. Thats all just rubbish. Shorts a pretty ****ing good replacement. To say otherwise is laughable. We'll be just as, if not more dominant next season. Just have a look at some of the stats for our players this season. I've had my worst since back when I joined. Gonzo failed to convert pretty much all of his starts, Toolman finished the season in seconds and Emm also had a shocker. Dunno where you pulled that one from.
Look at the top contender probable bowling lineups: Gamblers: 1. C Man 2. Tyson 3. Surkelton 4. Taylor 5. Read Cyclones: 1. Green 2. Johns 3. Laing 4. Wilson 5. Emm??? Vipers: 1. Eggman 2. Centin/Blunder 3. Storer 4. Devonshire 5. Bots Stingrays: 1. Farnsworth 2. Weaver 3. Cambridge 4. King 5. Welker Now, in that lot, I rate the Gamblers third with us fourth. We've got a few too many rookie players but if myself and Farny stand up, we'll be fine. This is exactly why the Gamblers shouldn't be rated as highly as they are afaic. Another very important issue is the destination of Yates.
