S9 Lineup Projections

Discussion in 'CricSim Cricket' started by Henry Marshall, Oct 24, 2009.

Page 1 of 10

  1. Henry Marshall H Marshall

    --
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2020
    Henry Marshall, Oct 24, 2009
    #1

  2. Ged GEC King

    The defnitive list:
    Rays:
    1. Vago
    2. Dafter
    3. Downpipes
    4. Hornby
    5. Berkuta
    6. Borisc
    7. Volavola
    8. Weaver
    9. Farnsworth
    10. King
    11. Yates

    Note. Downpipes still yet to sign. B Man would be most likely to come in.
     
    Ged, Oct 24, 2009
    #2

  3. Ged GEC King

    Pumas:
    1. N Miokovic
    2. Monkeywrench
    3. Jones
    4. T Miokovic
    5. Olsen
    6. Flack
    7. Pom keeper
    8. Lover
    9. Wilkinson
    10. C Man
    11. Oz
     
    Ged, Oct 24, 2009
    #3

  4. Benny BS Read

    1.Davis
    2.Armstrong
    3.Manera
    4.Gemmell
    5.ODriscoll
    6.Morgan
    7.Read(5)
    8.Taylor(4)
    9.Bullpitt (3) ( or Robinson if he doesnt sign)
    10.Surkelton(1)
    11.Crowley(2)

    Meister in For Read is also an option with him to open and everyone moves down a place in the order.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2009
    Benny, Oct 24, 2009
    #4

  5. Henry Marshall H Marshall

    Haha! No one can remember Graham's name!
     
    Henry Marshall, Oct 24, 2009
    #5

  6. Henry Marshall H Marshall

    Hunt?
     
    Henry Marshall, Oct 24, 2009
    #6

  7. AVA T Delonge

    1. Boland
    2. McGrath
    3. Luffman
    4. Gee
    5. Erschoff
    6. Torres
    7. Devonshire (4)
    8. Storer (3)
    9. Bots (5)
    10. Blunder (2)
    11. Eggman (1)
     
    AVA, Oct 24, 2009
    #7

  8. Benny BS Read

    Hunt >> Oz
     
    Benny, Oct 24, 2009
    #8

  9. Flash JP Thornton

    This season 9 build up threads are bullshit if there isn't any simming done.
     
    Flash, Oct 24, 2009
    #9

  10. Ged GEC King

    What is it with you and delusion?
    Anyway, Spinks would play over Robertson, no doubt in my mind.
     
    Ged, Oct 24, 2009
    #10

  11. Ged GEC King

    I reckon that Oz has shown more. Has ripped up in the PC so far.
     
    Ged, Oct 24, 2009
    #11

  12. Benny BS Read

    Nah.
     
    Benny, Oct 24, 2009
    #12

  13. Henry Marshall H Marshall

    Fair call but IMO its likely Pumas will go for a spinners pitch and play 2 spinners when at home.
     
    Henry Marshall, Oct 24, 2009
    #13

  14. Spinksy N Spinks

    Nah. Stiz has better stats by like 1.00.
     
    Spinksy, Oct 24, 2009
    #14

  15. Magic AJ Parker

    Only because of a good season 8 seasons ago... you've proven you can handle the BS over your last two seasons, they'd be crazy not to start you over Robinson.
     
    Magic, Oct 24, 2009
    #15

  16. Spinksy N Spinks

    Yes, but I doubt that's the way Gemmell thinks.
     
    Spinksy, Oct 24, 2009
    #16

  17. morgieb MC Burridge

    Spinks > Robinson.

    Meister & Bullpitt are no certainty to sign.
     
    morgieb, Oct 24, 2009
    #17

  18. MatthewJay TA Miokovic

    Lol, then why would you sign for the Gamblers if bias was going to be shown against you?
     
    MatthewJay, Oct 24, 2009
    #18

  19. Ged GEC King

    The bigger question that needs to be asked is why would the gamblers sign Spinks to only play him in reggies. Why take on such a shit member if it doesn't help firsts?
     
    Ged, Oct 24, 2009
    #19

  20. Wilson SB Wilson

    Why ask a question when you already know the answer.
     
    Wilson, Oct 24, 2009
    #20
Page 1 of 10

Share This Page