RUSim Bannings: A Discussion

Discussion in 'Seasonal Rugby' started by HeathDavisSpeed, Feb 23, 2012.

?

Should bans apply to simming?

  1. (1) No - bans are unrelated to simming. Change this policy NOW!

    15 vote(s)
    44.1%

  2. (2) Bans are unrelated to simming, but change the policy at the halfway point.

    1 vote(s)
    2.9%

  3. (3) As for (2), but change at the end of the season

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  4. (4) Bannings are relevant to simming. Keep the current policy in place.

    18 vote(s)
    52.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 2 of 2

  1. Athlai JJD Heads

    The sole voice of reason
     
    Athlai, Feb 23, 2012
    #21

  2. HeathDavisSpeed HT Davis

    Que?
     
    HeathDavisSpeed, Feb 23, 2012
    #22

  3. Speirz DG Speirs

    From a Crabs point of view we should be all for bannings meaning players miss games. Half our players aren't even on this site.:p
     
    Speirz, Feb 23, 2012
    #23

  4. Mousey AJ Son

    I think that bannings should result in suspension from all sims or none of the sims. It should be uniform, imo. Probably should have made that clearer.
     
    Mousey, Feb 23, 2012
    #24

  5. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    If the ban is for something related to SR, they should be suspended. Otherwise, let them play.
     
    Boobidy, Feb 26, 2012
    #25

  6. HeathDavisSpeed HT Davis

    Option 4 wins the vote. Bannings will stay.

    This means Azzal and Fiery are unavailable for Round 2 as they were banned over Round 1.
     
    HeathDavisSpeed, Mar 4, 2012
    #26
Page 2 of 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page