Well that settles it. If even you aren't saying it was good then we know Fiery's off the mark (given how biased you are).
I was impressed with the second half, I always thought we were going to win, but we just looked like a good side. What did you think of Hodges?
Ummm...I think you'll find he just said it was "decent". Look in that thesaurus of yours and you'll find the word "good" under synonyms for "decent" every time If anything, given he's a Brisbane supporter, he's probably going to be biased towards expecting and wanting a better performance. Just like you.
Just to clear this up, I always said club football, I'm not stupid enough to make a radical call like that when it's a fucking origin game and he hadn't even done it much at club yet. Anyways cya buddy, enjoy your little world that you're living in.
Gemmell said we were decent, which is defined as satisfactory. Look up the definition of good and you'll see they are clearly not the same. I think a 5-year-old could've told you that but then again you are a dumb cunt. It's pretty clear who thought they played better.
More of that good ole MF charm. Get on the ropes and the calls of "dumb cunt" and 5-year-old come out...attacking like a cornered rat. When you're talking about the performance of a rugby league team then "decent" and "good" mean pretty much the same thing... ..but now you're arguing who thought they played better...me or Gemmell. So the goal posts have moved. In any case, he used both words "decent" and "good" in his posts...and from what he's said we have a similar opinion on how Brisbane went today. The only difference was that he was more frustrated with how they went in the 1st half....which was understandable as a supporter. As a neutral I thought it was a decent armwrestle. I think a 5 year old would be able to understand this too.
No, they really don't. The meanings of these words do not change simply because of their being used in view of RL. Decent does not mean good. That's not moving the goal posts, you retard. It's another argument, adding weight to my position. If Gemmell, the most biased Broncos fan on here doesn't even think they played as well as you did, then that is a testament to your opinion being shitty and inaccurate. No, he said we played decent. And that we looked like a good side. That may be contradictory but at any rate, it's certainly not the same as what you said. An arm wrestle between two sides that played like shit.
You're just embarrassing yourself Fiery. You have NFI about RL. Stick to union and backgammon you old cunt.
The words are quite synonymous in any situation. As proven by any thesaurus ever printed. That's just bullshit. He thought they played as well as I did... and I'm not a retard. I have no mental or physical disabilities. More of your famous pedantry at it's best. It's basically exactly the same opinion I had. I disagree. I think Brisbane played pretty well...especially in the 2nd half. The stats show that. The scoreboard shows that. The points table shows that.
I have plenty of idea about RL...and plenty about rugby. Pride myself on that. Haven't played backgammon for years but reckon I could outsmart you in that...and don't consider myself "old" or a "cunt". And I'm not in the least bit embarrassed...and never will by you....in any situation. Anything else you would like to add to that excellent argument above?
