Plus there are alot more people who have joined in the last few seasons so his post rank has just dropped. So his SA will lower.
Nah Blunder< Surkleton His last two season have been better than yours, what might save you is a good PC but I rate Sullo above you. Also Eggman reaching Bullpitt standards will be hard. He'll need another big season.
Lol at reaching Bullpit's level. Eggman has heaps of potential, but Toast has been arguably the best bowler over the past 3 seasons.
Nah. My S7 > his His S8 > Mine S7 Blunder: 37 @ 30.35 Surkelton: 49 @ 33.08 Blunder played 3 less matches. S8 Blunder: 56 @ 39.07 Surkelton: 44 @ 37.16 Blunder played 1 less match Surkelton really didnt have that much a better S8 than me, I took more wickets... but he was mopre economical. And my S7 was better than his.
Im talking about for that season though. They could have just as good a season as each other, which was what I meant.
Yeh but IMO Eggman has the potential to have a really gun season. Which is why i put him as worse than Bullpit with the ().
Is it just me, or this season are there quite a few teams for whom one big bowling injury would be a massive, massive blow?
I wouldn't put the Vipers in that Category. Smith is perfectly capable of filling in. Although if Bots got injured we could have a problem playing at the Rays, Stickies or Saders with no spin back up.
Yeah very true. Although the likelyhood is that some of these average or rookie bowlers will step up a bit, not saying all of them but likely 1 per team. I wouldnt say we face that problem tbh because I dont really think we possess that strike bowler. Emm probably has the greatest ability to perform that role but I would say we possess a more steady attack.
Yeh you're attack is pretty solid all round. Quite underrated IMO. Lacks a bowler who makes you think shit hes in now though.
No its not but it would add a lot more to our batting and he would be very much used in the same type of role he is for GB.
