NSW v QLD @ MELBOURNE *SPOILERS*

Discussion in 'The Cesspit: Rugby League Discussion' started by Andrew93, Jun 3, 2009.

Page 25 of 27

  1. RyanG R Gee

    Awesome, now they can't complain saying that they were robbed.
     
    RyanG, Jun 4, 2009
    #481

  2. Old Mate M Perry

    LOL, awesome labels.
     
    Old Mate, Jun 4, 2009
    #482

  3. Bender BG Herd

    I think they got the foot and sideline labels around the wrong way <_<.

    >_>.
     
    Bender, Jun 4, 2009
    #483

  4. Kovas C Kovas

    The angle behind Hayne proves his foot was just in, including his heel, which was in the air.
     
    Kovas, Jun 4, 2009
    #484

  5. AVA T Delonge

    Yeah, I still think the back of his foot was in the air over the line, but some of his foot was on the line, from the look of that.
     
    AVA, Jun 4, 2009
    #485

  6. Mousey AJ Son

    Benefit of the doubt, should have been a try.
     
    Mousey, Jun 4, 2009
    #486

  7. AVA T Delonge

    Mmm, that is the problem. Two different cameras say two different things. Kinda proves there is some doubt, but anyway.
     
    AVA, Jun 4, 2009
    #487

  8. Ged GEC King

    There is no benefit of the doubt in rugby league. Find it for me in the rule book.
     
    Ged, Jun 4, 2009
    #488

  9. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    no camera says he doesnt put his foot down, one says he does, no doubt there, i havent heard any one who isnt a new south welshmen say there is a problem with that call, and the fact remains even if he gets that one denied, they get one that goes over a meter forward accepted, no-one was robbed of anything
     
    stupersteve03, Jun 4, 2009
    #489

  10. Ged GEC King

    Exactly. That call was far better than one of the most clear cut forward passes ever. There was a roof so there wasn't any wind. Try and explain how the ball was passed before the try line and bounced a meter over it without going forward.
     
    Ged, Jun 4, 2009
    #490

  11. Mousey AJ Son

    Victorian here, gimme a break.
     
    Mousey, Jun 4, 2009
    #491

  12. Mousey AJ Son

    Victorian, but Queensland come Origin time. Connections up there. NO-one was robbed, but I thought there was a benefit of the doubt rule for some reason.
     
    Mousey, Jun 4, 2009
    #492

  13. Ged GEC King

    Oh. It's not just you. Everyone talks about benefit of the doubt to the attacking team. It's a myth!
     
    Ged, Jun 4, 2009
    #493

  14. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    there is, attacking team gets benifit of the doubt in regards to the ball in the dead ball area, thats about all
     
    stupersteve03, Jun 4, 2009
    #494

  15. Mousey AJ Son

    Oh, ok. I thought there was though...
     
    Mousey, Jun 4, 2009
    #495

  16. Mousey AJ Son

    Ahh, that'd be it then. Thanks guys. RL I have trouble with. I play Union for school so I know the rules but in Melbourne we don't get enough coverage for me to watch enough to learn all the fine points.
     
    Mousey, Jun 4, 2009
    #496

  17. AVA T Delonge

    As if it isn't? So people just made it up to cause arguements?
     
    AVA, Jun 4, 2009
    #497

  18. Ged GEC King

    Show me where it says it in the rule book.
     
    Ged, Jun 4, 2009
    #498

  19. AVA T Delonge

    Link me to the rule book.
     
    AVA, Jun 4, 2009
    #499

  20. Colesy BL Hornby

    Get a copy of it and i will.

    You think the Video Ref has a "Benifit of the doubt" button for lols?
     
    Colesy, Jun 4, 2009
    #500
Page 25 of 27

Share This Page