Johnathan Thurston vs Scott Prince

Discussion in 'The Cesspit: Rugby League Discussion' started by Alec, May 8, 2009.

?

Who is better IYO

  1. Thurston

    58.6%
  2. Prince

    41.4%
  1. Ged GEC King

    The best players are still at the same level though. I know what you're saying but our selectors don't pick shit ****s. The same 17 would still be chosen even if we had double the players...
     
  2. Lukic L Popovic

    Exactly.

    He's a 5/8 naturally, not a half. He carved it just after he left the Dogs, when he was still playing 6.

    At Halfback, I would want Prince more than him.

    I've even said before, if QLD wanted to set up for the future, they'd go 6. Thurston, 7. Prince.

    Locky is to good to leave out though. However that'll be the plan in 2011 and beyond.
     
    Last edited: May 9, 2009
  3. Ged GEC King

    Yeah. He went shit in 2007, didn't he.....
    Dolt.
     
  4. Alec AD Funkotron

    2011 and beyond Prince will be 31 and beyond.
     
  5. Lukic L Popovic

    Fluke season.

    He played well, still a better 5/8 than 1/2 though.
     
    Last edited: May 9, 2009
  6. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Prince will get in one or two origin series post-Lockyer, then he will retire. Then unfortunately we will be looking at a Thurston/Cronk halves pairing.
     
  7. Lukic L Popovic

    Naa, Nate Myles and Thurston.

    Myles will put a few nice kicks behind, repeat sets etc.
     
  8. Paddy P Orr

    He had a good 2007 season but remember he played behind an injury filled forward pack, had inexperience in that department, but I do think he was more effective in 05 when he was five eighth.
     
  9. Kovas C Kovas

    I'm not saying he's getting worse or he was shit, just that he'll be gone from rep football in the next few years. He'll probably retire from it next year.
     
  10. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Nah, Ben Hunt will be in the NRL by then. :p
     

Share This Page