ANZAC Test (CH9 coverage)

You don't have debates. You're not intelligent enough to understand the concepts of logic and logical conclusions inferred from evidence. The point you made about me not giving Vatuvei the benefit if the situation was reversed, is an example of this. As is the point you make about officials making mistakes in sporting events. Neither has anything at all to do with the fact that Vatuvei made an error and that you're incapable of conceding that point. Me making the argument that he made 3 errors is not biased. It's a demonstrable fact. Which you won't admit, because you're a biased fuckwit. Instead you prefer to resort to typical forms of non-argument employed by those who, yeah you guessed it, don't have any arguments to espouse.

It's like being the twilight zone talking to you.

MF - Vatuvei making three times as many errors as any other winger is due to his shitty ball handling.
Howsie - Vatuvei making three times as many errors as any other winger is due to his being kicked to more often.



MF - Vatuvei made three errors in the Anzac Test, one of which was missed by the official.
Howsie - Vatuvei made two errors because one was missed so it doesn't count.

The only biased cunt here is you. And nice job completely avoiding the rest of the post.

 

I'm not talking about that.

The notion that I'm biased because I like Thurston and dislike Gallen. Something asserted with uncorrelated evidence, can be dismissed with uncorrelated evidence. I dislike Hodges, a QLDer, and I like Luke Lewis, a NSWmen. Does that prove anything? Of course not. What fucking moronic thing to suggest.

You and Howsie should take your two IQ points, rub them together and see if you can start a fire.

 

Nope, but it sure as hell shows you have an agenda against him. It's not a fact either, it's your opinion. Just like it was the opinion of the ref that it was stripped.

 

Do you think it was an error or not?

 

I think I've already answered that my man.

 

Where?

 

Howsie, if you think it was an error then why the fuck did you say "So two errors then..." as if the third is excusable because the officials missed it? All the while claiming that I'm biased because I pointed out that he did indeed make three errors.

What a fucking goose you are.

 

Post 318.

 

Nope, it was a loose carry. Thaiday's hand came in contact with the ball but he sure as heck didn't strip it. That's just my opinion though, not a fact. Ref obviously saw it differently. Happens.

 

So we both agree it was an error. But I'm biased for pointing it out? I'm biased because I forgot Vatuvei made a try saving tackle (which you still haven't cited) but you're not biased because you forgot Vatuvei made 3 and not 2 errors?

You are without doubt one of the most hypocritical, dishonest, idiotic and biased RL fans with whom I have ever had the displeasure of speaking.

Dead. Fucking. Set.

 

No, you clearly have some sort of agenda against Vatuvei, your've more or less proven that over the last three or four pages carrying on like a twit.

As for the try saving tackle on Uate, watch the first half as I said earlier. I can't remember the exact minute it occured but from memory it was later on in the half. If I manage to catch a full replay this week I'll let you know.

You don't work or anything though right? Should have plenty of time to watch it yourself.

 

Address the arguments you weak cunt.

I will. Haven't got around to watching the replay yet.