AFL Supercoach Draft 2013

seems two fellas read my post and vetoed that bit after so it's all fine now.

Just want to know who actually thought that trade was legitimately biased and why? and who were the cunts who only vetoed one half

 

Yeah I expected you to be one. But one (or both, even) of Mousey/Harps had to have been one too which kind of sucks as they're eliminated.

It just seemed way too tactical. I certainly would have downvoted your/theo's trade if I thought it was okay to vote tactically.

So, so dire.

 

Just to let y'all know, Masters and I have agreed on a revised trade - just in case you cunts find it objectionable.

 

Why?

 

To be fair there I didn't know that and it certainly made sense for an active (one of you) to vote ahead of an inactive.

I'm amazed you can't vote. Surely you can? Otherwise the req. votes should be down to three.

 

We both believe we're getting a better player. The last one was vetoed as, despite the fact that I received less average, people thought I won by too much. I removed the 82-77 defender upgrade which diggler found objectionable. If diggler doesn't vote the deal would get through so I removed it as I believed it'd stop his vote.

Far more likely that Theo or you are lying IMO

 

That's a really good feature but shit that 3 aren't required now.

Brett WAC ftr. Didn't even explain why

 

Predicted's have me beating Pheo by 3 pts this week. ITSTL.

P.S. Lachie Hansen is becoming my favourite player. I eventually bought into it and brought him in (was him v adams v tom lynch adelaide) to my other two money leagues and so far he's more than just repaying me. WAFG.

 

This is the third time I've played theo and the third time
I've checked the fanfooty scores at halftime to see his four Richmond players as the top four on it


Ffs