2013 State Of Origin I - Sydney

Discussion in 'Matches' started by Maroon_Faithful, Jun 2, 2013.

  1. LukeTyson L Tyson

    Throwing a random punch in an brawl is nothing compared to punching a defenceless guy on the ground.
     
  2. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Hodges would cop one every time he got tackled.
     
  3. LukeTyson L Tyson

    Legit opinion.
     
  4. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    I can't work out if you're a troll or just plain stupid.

    Tate was defenceless too you mongoloid. He was grappling another player and got phantom punched. And Jennings's threw a full force blow. Tate's was a jab ffs. How retarded do you have to be to not see that?
     
  5. LukeTyson L Tyson

    You felt both the punches did you ? In a brawl punches get thrown all over the place, was it the best thing to do ? No was it better than punching a bloke on the ground ? Yes. Never punch some on the ground especially when they cant defend themselves.

    Stop defending your fucking love buddy, faggot.
     
  6. Magic AJ Parker

    Just come out and say it then, would've saved me arguing with a cunt who at the end is just going to saying nah you're wrong because you're biased.
     
  7. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    lol what. I deliberately didn't say that because that's not how I argue (most of the time). It's an ad hominem.
     
  8. Magic AJ Parker

    Just because nothing occurs doesn't mean it's not provocation.

    Provocation can occur without reaction, that's seriously such a dire argument.
     
  9. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    He doesn't push, he holds them.
     
  10. LukeTyson L Tyson

    You poor cunt. How many times have you had to repeat this.
     
  11. Toolman TR Man

    Tate's was obviously worse.
     
  12. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    No, I didn't feel both punches. But I know boxing. And I know a full force punch that starts at the hips from a half-arsed jab that starts at the shoulder. Don't give me this shit about being on the ground. Hitting somebody in the back of the head is much worse.
     
  13. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    Yeah, I think that's patently absurd.
     
  14. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    Jennings connects properly with that punch, (like Tate did with his) and he has the potential to kill somebody. Particularly if they're knocked out cold and then slam into the turf. That is infinitely more dangerous than jabbing some cunt who knows it's coming, on the ground or not.
     
  15. LukeTyson L Tyson

    Wasn't intentionally punching Tate at the back of the head though he launched himself off the ground and punched over his team mate to land a punch, Tates head moved during that time and once again in a fucking brawl when you can expect punches being thrown around. Tate intentionally punching Bird in the head while he is on the ground. Dog shot.
     
  16. LukeTyson L Tyson

    He punched him in the temple. Dangerous.
     
  17. Toolman TR Man

  18. Toolman TR Man

    Going by MF's logic, a bouncer at the club running in throwing punches to help his mates out is worse than a man kicking a 5 yr old in the head (the equivalent of somebody who's helpless, as Bird was lying on the ground)
     
  19. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    So now you're saying Tate's was a dog shot but Jennings's wasn't?

    Jennings's was way more reckless than Tate's. You can certainly expect punches to be thrown around in a brawl (that's what a brawl is). Not fucking hay-makers at some cunt who, like Bird, was defenceless.
     
  20. Maroon_Faithful M Faithful

    A jab to the temple is, I dare say, less dangerous than a hay-maker to the back of the head.
     

Share This Page