Why would I have been made opener because I was inactive? I thought that the more active you are, the better you are?
Not that noone else wanted to open. :facepalm: I wanted to open but Steve want to experiment , get your facts right
:facepalm: Anyone who is in the starting XI can open as long as they are in the team , I dont understand how I dont count though even though I am not a batsman Didnt you watch one of the SA vs Aus games , where SA couldnt find a opening partner for I think it was McKenzie ,then they brought Morne Morkel(a bowler) to open. See it makes sense
You're an idiot. In a team that already has eight batsmen in it, you're not going to open with a bowler ffs. Just shut up. There were no serious opening options who wanted to open.
Just face defeat like a man South Africa batted all the way to 7 or 8 and all of those 7/8 batsman were active unlike here where half of them are inactive and will be worthlesss opening.
South Africa didn't actually select Morne Morkel to open in a match though; they used him to open because they had an injury mid-game. That's entirely different. They only had six batsmen and they didn't want to lengthen the tail. It also, by the by, failed miserably. You're a fucking idiot. I'm not gonna reply any further to your garbage. To the ignore list you go.
Thanks goodness by you putting me on the ignore list means I won :sarcasm: You dont know what SA were doing they could of just sent in Hashim Amla but why didnt they
Crazy shit, just can't get a run this season. And oh fuck me, two quick wickets then we fell asleep in the field after that.