Wiki says 1999 pre-tournament favourites New Zealand. 1995 pre-tournament favourites Australia 1991 In 1991, Australia were simply the best team in the world, and the pre-tournament favourites (http://www.theguardian.com/)
By memory we were dominant leading up to1987 That would mean the favourite won in 1987 1991 2003 2011 4 out of 7 world cups have been won by the favourite (including Howe's stats) And in 2003 and 1991 it was won by a visiting pre tournament favourite.
Is it just me who thinks that for most teams, playing at home in a World Cup might be a disadvantage in a way? I believe in home advantage as a general rule, but I find World Cups to be a bit different. I get that 3 out of 6 RWCs have been won by the home team but 6 is a smallish sample size anyway. If I think to other WCs, I feel home advantage has often seen excessive pressure on the home team, which in turn sees them bow out earlyish. I can't comment on the state of world rugby and which teams are favourites, but that's just a general thought.
Some real shit selections; Messam is a starter or not in the team at all, Cruden is useless just fuck him off and Crotty isn't an impact player would rather have Piatua....
'On a ground where New Zealand have only lost one in their last 11' Which makes it basically the same as any other home ground for them?
Are England going for as many different errors as possible? I feel like I'm getting a crash course in the rulebook.
Saw that coming. Was going to post try coming up. A lineout on the opposition 22 is try time. England bottling it atm.