How the **** does Mortimer get binned for that but Cronk doesn't for the first one? ****ing bullshit. Hayne & Slater should be off, And if Mortimer is off then Cronk should be.
And really when you think about it, if Slater has been charged as starting it then how is Mortimer the 3rd man in the Slater vs Hayne fight by pushing away Cronk or whoever it was. Surely that would mean Cronk was involved, hence making him the third man not Mortimer.
Parra are such cheap ****s. Hayne is a ****ing moron too I don't get why slater was bnned, what did he do exactly? ref suggested a forearm but I didn't see it on the replay.
Nah Slater deserved to go, tried to put an elbow to the head i think, but his arm kinda hit him. Hayne a dick though, should've gone off too.
Nah I kind of agree with it, the refs do it in all circumstances even though it more often than not means they are contradicting themselves. The first fight was a warning, players know that... if anything happens after that you know you're on a fine line to sitting in the bin. Just the way it is at least (I think anyway) they're usually pretty consistent with it.
Hayne wont be out for origin, it's just an unwritten rule. Who was the last player suspended from an origin match anyway? Someone to name a player from last year and make me look a dick.