Yes but you made a smart-arse reply to a question and ended it with ""; classic Raidecunt post. If you phrased it how I did - then fine. But you didn't. This is exactly what we're talking about.
The kid wafts about the forum, but he is in his last year or second last year of school and is knuckling down a bit I think.
The fact that you thought this is what got in trouble in the first place; don't visually reinforce it.
me v vipers 47 (83) - Bots 81 (202) - Blunder 0 (1) - Blunder 32 (82) - Blunder 95 (184) - Blunder 20 (42) - Smith 75 (166) - Eggman 98 (110) - Smith 51 (81) - Torres 22 (37) - Welker 51 (121) - Weaver 15 (20) - Weaver 587 (1130) ave: 48.9 off 91 balls I was better against them when I was batting #5 in my first season of BS for the Gamblers. lol. Still - I'll take that, a good record against a team with that attack. I have the worst knack of not converting against them. And making really slow knocks. Just re-reading this post and I sound so much like Weldone. idc though. So really, the Vipers just need to get past me and Martyn for them to be crusing <_< I've never had to face the new ball against them, mind. That'll be a challenge. Eggman only getting me once though is gun.
Did they not have a significantly worse attack back then though? Even in Season 10 their spinner was Hughesy. It's all about the Season 11 games against them.