That said I reckon we'll finish near last this season. We didn't win it so nobody (rightly) remembers us as good and pandas/colts/mustangs/sabres/ocelots/parrots will all jump us with training given both activity and us having topped out in a lot of ways
You making the finals doesn't mean shit if you cannot win it against the side who beat us. We proved all season long we can beat you but we lost to the BEST team in the league on route to destroying you in the finals Lee 12 ppg 7apg 1.3 spg 1.5@38% 3pt shooter Morgan 17.5ppg 6apg 7rpg 2.2 spg Ames 17ppg 6.5rpg 1.5spg 1.5@40% 3pt shooter Hall 15ppg 10rpg 1.5bpg 1 spg Starris 9ppg 7.8rpg 2bpg 1 spg Cambridge 15ppg 10apg 4rpg 1.3spg 1.5@40% 3pt Vince 13ppg 7.5rpg 2.7bpg 1 spg Never fouls, never commits turnovers 2.7@46% Lukic 15ppg 4rpg 4apg 1.5spg 1.7@37% Hunt 19ppg 10.5rpg 1.5bpg BEST LIMITED POSSESSION PLAYER IN SIM!!!! Chewie 13ppg 9.2rpg 3bpg The stats certainly aren't in your favour. At best you could fall even with us with some manipulation. You most deffo are not >>>>>>>>>>>>> then me, looking at your stats I'm not even sure how you got a 7.9 considering how poorly you shot teh ball some nights. The gap between us 2 is smaller then the gap between Iridium and Steve and the gap between Starris and Chewie using Mouseys ratings which I do contest some of but they are good enough to get my point across Cambridge 7.8 vs Lee 7.1 Vince 7.4 vs Morgan 7.9 Lukic 7.2 vs Ames 7.6 Hunt 7.9 vs Hall 7.4 Chewie 7.3 vs Starris 7.0 Not to mention our bench has Schaw who is a 20ppg player every now and then which your bench doesn't contain Schaw 7.3 O'Niell 6.9 Ryabovol 6.7 vs Bakkum 6.9 Rask 7.0 Evans 6.8 Ikram 7.0
If my logic is retard atleast prove why it is. This is basketball the game of stats they are all at your disposal. Once you get to post season 70% of the regular season doesn't mean a thing. All the matters is how you did against the teams you are coming up against to survive and advance. We couldn't get over the colts who obviously were the best team proven both in the regular season and the post season but we most definitely did have it over you guys in the regular season so odds are we match up better and what do you know we would have beaten you in the post season if our paths aligned
Personally I believe the Tigers were a better team last season because they won more, simple as that. Wins aside, I reckon the Pandas had better players and if the season were simmed again they'd have a better record, I just think they didn't get it together until the end of the season, and looking at the season as a whole I have to go with the Tigers That said, I'm picking the Pandas for this season's championship.
Tigers got to the finals in a shit conference. Common knowledge. I'd rate the Pandas higher than them.
This is overlooked a lot in terms of season wins. We played more games against the best team and the third team in our division was stronger than the second in yours by seasons end. We also had poor form through the first half of the season. Which effected our record but did not in fact make us the worse team. I think across the season it could certainly be argued you played better than us. That does not mean you were the better team. As an aside the snide little Christian remark was so unessecary...
So anyway, direness aside. Mousey to allocate the players IMO and do a preview of the season. If he's not keen maybe someone like Bots? Reckon Ocelots have a more than passable starting 5 but we will need rookies to contribute decent minutes off the bench to challenge for the playoffs.
The only thing that's stopping me doing this atm are my 3 assignments due tomorrow and a 4000 worder on Monday. Have one after that, but I'll have enough time to do it with only one on the plate. So yeah, Wednesday latest unless I forget.
